Re: PLCC SOCKETS

Article View: sci.electronics

Article #17124

#17124

From: BANISHED BRAZILIAN
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1987 00:05

15 lines
1389 bytes

As a component engineer I personally tested out some 68 pin PLCC sockets for
use in a new product we're developing. As far as I could tell, the overall
best PLCC sockets are from Burndy, Methode, and Yamaichi. All of these are
based on high pressure tin contact design, are relatively cost-effective and
reliable, and use the same extraction tool (namely the Burndy QILEXT-1 extrac-
tion tool). If anyone is interested in further information please send me
some e-mail to the effect.

				   Yours truly,  BIG DAVE.

-- 
David P. Miller - Loral Instrumentation.           /    USUAL   \  
{sdcsvax,sdcc3} loral!miller                       \ DISCLAIMER / 
********************************************************************************
   "Ai, mas que saudades eu tenho da' Amelia, isso sim que era mulher ....."

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1329@loral.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcc6!loral!miller

References: <928@phred.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcc6!loral!miller
From: miller@loral.UUCP (BANISHED BRAZILIAN)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: PLCC SOCKETS
Message-ID: <1329@loral.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 12-Jan-87 19:05:30 EST
Article-I.D.: loral.1329
Posted: Mon Jan 12 19:05:30 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Jan-87 04:53:09 EST
References: <928@phred.UUCP>
Reply-To: miller@loral.UUCP (BANISHED BRAZILIAN)
Organization: Loral Instrumentation, San Diego
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message