🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <626@gec-mi-at.co.uk> adam@gec-mi-at.co.uk (Adam Quantrill) writes:
>In article <1597@ihuxi.ATT.COM> store2@ihuxi.ATT.COM (Kit Kimes) writes:
><In article <67@sdeggo.UUCP>, dave@sdeggo.UUCP (David L. Smith) writes:
><> 
><> Instead of messing about with the audio signal, why not just reach in with
><> a soldering iron and clippers and tweak the chip out of the circuit, or
><> make it think that it always has some noise there with a little 3800 HZ
><> oscillator tied to its input.  [..]
><> 
><Sorry, but the protection circuit will be buried deep in one of the LSI's.
><There will be no way to remove it and even if you could, the notch will
><still be there on the source CD.  That is what has everyone so up in arms.
>
>How about frequency-shifting the signal so that the notch is now at 3805Hz?
>A .2% speedup isn't subjectively noticeable.
>       -Adam.
>
>/* If at first it don't compile, kludge, kludge again.*/


How about doubling/halving both the CD and the DAT speeds?
	- rob