Article View: sci.electronics
Article #17880Cable TV Block Converter Woes
From: LesebergB
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1987 20:43
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1987 20:43
44 lines
3085 bytes
3085 bytes
I recently moved and so I had to change to a different
cable TV service. I thought, "No problem, I have cable-ready
TV's and VCR." Well, they hooked me and I hit the "cable" switch
on all my equipment. As it turns out, I do have a problem. My
TV's and VCR are all 112 channel capability, but it's not
enough. The cable service offers the standard 2-13 VHF Lo and Hi
plus cable channels 14 - 53. My TV's and VCR get up to about 42
then show either snow or channel 42 on the remaining stations.
My roommate has a converter (his TV is not cable ready) and he
picks them all up. The neighbor has a 130 channel capability
set, and he receives them all fine.
I didn't want to get a converter for each piece of
equipment, I'd loose the use of my remotes and being able to
record more then one channel while I was away. So I decided to
invest in a RADIO SHACK cable block converter. Before I bought
it I knew I was in for a project, it only moves channels 2-42 to
the UHF band. Channel 42 ends up on 83 UHF, it's what I have now.
Well, I cracked it open and decided to lower the oscillator
frequency. I changed a coil and adjusted the trimmer cap. This
moved things enough so I could get the missing 10 or so channels
on stations 72-82 UHF. I really don't care about getting
everything moved onto UHF, I only want a means to receive the
missing 10 channels. My problem now is these last 10 channels
are fuzzy. Either the input has a trap for these higher channels
or I'm getting harmonic interference from the oscillator or
something. I've adjusted the oscillator around but no matter
where I put the missing 10 channels, the upper 8 of these are
fuzzy, the lower 2 are usually OK.
Has anyone attempted this before, have any ideas to
bounce around, know of a block converter that will do what I
want, or need something to do and would like for me to send a
schematic as an exercise ? No ? Can't blame you, I don't know
what to do either 8-) ! If nothing else, I'll try to live with
the fuzziness. Anyone else have this problem ?
------- ------- ------- Brad Leseberg
-====------ -====------ -====------ AT&T Information &
-======------ -======------ -======------ Communication Systems
--====------- --====------- --====------- 11900 N. Pecos DR-31e26
----------- ----------- ----------- Westminster, CO 80234
------- ------- ------- ...ihnp4!drutx!bal
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4829@drutx.ATT.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mimsy!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!drutx!balShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mimsy!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!drutx!bal From: bal@drutx.ATT.COM (LesebergB) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.video Subject: Cable TV Block Converter Woes Message-ID: <4829@drutx.ATT.COM> Date: Thu, 6-Aug-87 16:43:14 EDT Article-I.D.: drutx.4829 Posted: Thu Aug 6 16:43:14 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Aug-87 13:56:02 EDT Organization: AT&T, Denver, CO Lines: 44