Article View: sci.electronics
Article #17903UPS's good and bad
From: Steven Berman
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1987 13:11
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1987 13:11
57 lines
3182 bytes
3182 bytes
Regarding a recent query about quality of UPS (uninterruptible power supply)
output:
I have recently spent some time researching UPS technology of today.
There is a wide range of equipment available, good, bad, and ugly! Beware
that there are major differences in implementation. What follows is a short
summary of several technologies.
OFF-LINE UPS:
This machine has a feed-through from main power to output
with some filter caps across it. When power fails, a switch-over
circuit connects the battery to an inverter circuit, which supplies
the output. An active battery charge circuit keeps the cells
charged when "off-line". This is the least expensive UPS and
by far the worst for computer-related applications. It's plusses
are 100% off-line efficiency, quiet operation. Minuses: dirty
switchover. Up to 30 msec switch time. Really intended for
brute-force loads, that can handle the spikes, and drop-out.
ON-LINE UPS:
This is a good middle-of-the-road machine. It uses a battery
charge circuit to both keep up the cells AND supply an inverter.
The inverter is the only source to the output. This means that
switch-overs have EXACT wave-form synchronization. Pluses:
Near zero switch-over time. Modest cost, small. Minuses:
VERY noisy, inverter tends to squeal at 5-30 KHz. (very annoying)
Can be destroyed by a dirty power feed-in. (Real Life example:
Gasoline Generators feeding UPS: Blew out all the inverter
transistors after only 100-hours of up-time.) Sola makes these.
FERRO-RESONANT UPS:
The cream of the crop! Theese machines use a HUGE transformer
fed from the main to supply the output. When power fails, the
batteries kick-in and the enormous L of the transformer maintains
the synchronization of the sine-wave. These machines have small
switch-over times (~5 msec), but the big plus is that perfect
sine-wave. They are quiet, since they use the transformer
when on-line, and are more efficient than the ON-LINE models.
BEST Power Tech. makes these, and I bought three recently.
Hope this helps,
I'll gladly provide more details through mail.
I have a file that compares ~10 companies with cost/KVA.
~Steve
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Berman
Mechanical Engineering-Robotics
The Robotics Institute
also Computer Science Department
Carnegie-Mellon University
ARPA: berman@me.ri.cmu.edu
UUCP: {harvard | ucbvax | seismo}!me.ri.cmu.edu!berman
SNAIL: 5668 Darlington Rd. Pittsburgh, PA 15217
This does not represent the opinion or policy of my employer...yet.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1003@me.ri.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rochester!pt!me.ri.cmu.edu!bermanShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rochester!pt!me.ri.cmu.edu!berman From: berman@me.ri.cmu.edu (Steven Berman) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: UPS's good and bad Message-ID: <1003@me.ri.cmu.edu> Date: Tue, 11-Aug-87 09:11:09 EDT Article-I.D.: me.1003 Posted: Tue Aug 11 09:11:09 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 13-Aug-87 06:20:40 EDT Reply-To: berman@me.ri.cmu.edu (Steven Berman) Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 57 Keywords: UPS, on/off line.