🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #17985

Re: TTL Questions

#17985
From: Rob Warnock
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1987 05:16
41 lines
2499 bytes
In article <192@nikhefk.UUCP> henkp@nikhefk.UUCP (Henk Peek) writes:
+---------------
| >In article <18007@amdcad.AMD.COM> rpw3@amdcad.UUCP (Rob Warnock) writes:
| > |Notice that any resistor value less than "V_max_0/(I_max_0 * #of_inputs)"
| > |will be fine, as it's no worse than a true gate output would be. For a
| > |7400 TTL single "standard load" input, that's 0.4/.016 = 25 ohms or less.
| >The (low) input curent of a standard single load 7400 TTL input is 1.6 mA.
| >The maxium serie R for a single load standard input is 0.4/0.0016 = 250 ohms.
| >henk peek  ..!seismo!mcvax!nikhefk!henkp.UUCP
+---------------

Yup! I blew it! Will the net ever forgive?!?!? Mea culpa, folks...
(That's what I get for not doing the whole thing in millivolts and milliamps.)

But the part about using a 1/10-watt resistor for pulldowns and the guy in
manufacturing who wanted to occasionally zap the pulldowns from a bed-of-nails
tester and needing to use short pulses was right, I just forgot what value
we ended up using for a pulldown.

Let's see if I can do simple arithmetic tonight:

I'm sure it was 1/10-watt (they were *small*), so using R = (V^2)/P, if
the tester pulled up to +5 the resistor would have had to been less than
250 ohm to burn up. A 100 ohm resistor would dissipate 1/10 watt if held
high at 3.2 V (and a bit more if held at 3.6), so maybe I was just off by
a factor of 10 and we were using 100 ohm 1/10-watt pulldowns. (Crosscheck:
100 ohms could pull down 4 mA at 0.4 V, which is two 74S' loads. Yes, I know
an 'S low is 0.5 V...)

So. I dropped a power of 10, but was otherwise reporting true.

Sorry again for the error.


Rob Warnock
Systems Architecture Consultant

UUCP:	  {amdcad,fortune,sun,attmail}!redwood!rpw3
ATTmail:  !rpw3
DDD:	  (415)572-2607
USPS:	  627 26th Ave, San Mateo, CA  94403
Technical Details
Message-ID: <18054@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!amdcad!rpw3
References: <7105@alice.UUCP> <764@sol.ARPA> <128@umich.UUCP> <20036@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <18007@amdcad.AMD.COM> <192@nikhefk.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!amdcad!rpw3
From: rpw3@amdcad.AMD.COM (Rob Warnock)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: TTL Questions
Message-ID: <18054@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: Tue, 25-Aug-87 01:16:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.18054
Posted: Tue Aug 25 01:16:05 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Aug-87 02:21:37 EDT
References: <7105@alice.UUCP> <764@sol.ARPA> <128@umich.UUCP> <20036@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <18007@amdcad.AMD.COM> <192@nikhefk.UUCP>
Reply-To: rpw3@amdcad.UUCP (Rob Warnock)
Organization: [Consultant] San Mateo, CA
Lines: 41
Keywords: TTL, pullups