Article View: sci.electronics
Article #18021FM audio recording?
From: Jim Rees
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1987 18:25
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1987 18:25
12 lines
1177 bytes
1177 bytes
(Maybe this belongs in rec.audio, but I don't want to trigger a long discussion. I just want the facts, ma'am.) How come FM was never widely used for audio recording? It seems like FM would be the ideal way to overcome the inherent non-linearities and noise of magnetic tape. You could do away with the bias circuitry and the sensitive adjustments that depend on the type of tape. It would even be relatively insensitive to saturation and variations in tape output. And erasing would be incredibly easy. You wouldn't even need a separate erase head, I claim! It seems so obvious, there must be something wrong with it. FM has long been used for instrumentation and video recording for these reasons.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3746d52b.b8ab@apollo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!apollo!reesShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!apollo!rees From: rees@apollo.uucp (Jim Rees) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: FM audio recording? Message-ID: <3746d52b.b8ab@apollo.uucp> Date: Mon, 14-Sep-87 14:25:00 EDT Article-I.D.: apollo.3746d52b.b8ab Posted: Mon Sep 14 14:25:00 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 15-Sep-87 06:49:57 EDT Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, Mass. Lines: 12