Article View: sci.electronics
Article #18051Re: Lightning Protection Advice Needed
From: commgrp
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1987 14:49
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1987 14:49
237 lines
13427 bytes
13427 bytes
>I am wondering what kind of steps I can take to minimize the
>damaging effects of lightning...
>
> Ralph M. Hightower, Jr.
The following was posted by Howard Hull on rec.ham-radio, 5 Aug. 1985:
LIGHTNING PROTECTION
1. First order protection -
On the tallest object associated with your structure, mount an
extended umbrella-like fixture a few meters in diameter, with numerous
sharp points along the periphery and across the crown, spaced about 1
meter apart. (You can make the thing from re-bar and heavy duty
chicken wire unless you have high winds like we have around here.) Use
a large diameter conductor (1 to 2 cm.) to connect the umbrella points
together at the center and thence down to a suitable ground stake
located at a place where soil moisture is prevalent, but more import-
antly, try to make the conductor run in a straight line with *no*
sharp corners; use a minimum radius of 1.5 meters on any bends in the
ground wire. Keep this wire at least 2 meters from any power or
communications conduit at all places along its route.
Theory:
The multitude of points will emit a trickle corona continuously,
resulting in a space charge of ionized air within 20 meters of the
umbrella. The space charge will terminate the cloud-to-ground elec-
tric field across a broad hemisphere and will reduce the local field
gradient to a value below that needed to form "leaders". The umbrella
will likely not ever be hit by lightning; however, the conductor gauge
is set to minimize the damage inherent in such a strike. (A strike,
if it occurs, will likely be a secondary, (resulting from the shift in
electrostatic field just after a strike) to another object within a
fraction of a km.) This approach, you should note, puts additional
stress on your neighbors (they will see a slight rise in their hit
statistics) as it only postpones the discharge until the cloud has
moved past your installation. The ground conductor is spaced from
other conduits so that the Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) associated with
the 10000 Ampere surge will not be able to develop equivalent currents
in parallel conductors adjacent to the ground wire. Using a large
diameter and avoiding bends reduces the per length inductance discon-
tinuities. This discourages the abandonment of your ground conductor
in favor of nearby metal objects such as power conduits (resulting in
hazardous elevation of the system ground potential to thousands of
volts above the mains).
2. Second order protection -
Protect your primary power entry by use of a surge protector having
four main elements
a.) Line fuses for each hot main NO FUSE FOR THE WHITE NEUTRAL. No
circuit breakers (too slow).
b.) Self extinguishing gas discharge tubes or arc chutes routed to a
primary ground stake *separated* by 3 or more meters from the umbrella
ground mentioned above, *not* using the same stake, even, and using
the same linear routing algorithm mentioned above.
c.) Heavy gauge inductors, 1 microhenry or thereabouts for typical 30
to 50 Ampere per phase service levels, to choke the surge out of the
consumer side of the system. NONE IN THE WHITE NEUTRAL.
d.) Post choke line clamping to WHITE NEUTRAL. This is where the
witchcraft comes in. One candidate is the Metal Oxide Varistor (MOV).
They have two disadvantages: They age, gradually reducing their
threshold over time until one day they evaporate in a ball of fire
during a line surge. They have a rather remote threshold character-
istic compared to, say, a Silicon TransZorb. They have several advan-
tages: They are cheap. They come in packaging that is familiar to
professional electricians. They are generally more robust than Selen-
ium or Silicon protectors. They have a smaller geometry than a
Selenium protector. Another candidate is a combination protector made
up from a ground referenced 50 Ampere triac in series with either a
lower rated voltage MOV or TransZorb element, with the triac gate
wired back to (an artfully positioned) tap on the gas tube/arc chute
ground. From here (this stuff belongs in a fire-rated NEMA box) the
WHITE NEUTRAL and GREEN NEUTRAL are tied together at this one point
only, and passed through a medium size conductor to the primary ground
stake by a route that is separated by 1.5 meters from the gas tube/arc
chute ground.
Theory:
If your power line gets hit, the gas tube fires and conducts the
surge current to ground. The 20 kilovolts experienced by your service
entry (for about 10 microseconds) will go through the chokes and will
cause the MOV or complex protector shunt to break down and draw a
steadily rising current (to many tens of Amperes), but immediately
choked to a reduced voltage. The fuses will, after a while, be blown
away. Until then, the MOVs will clamp the WHITE NEUTRAL to the mains
(perhaps resulting in noticeable rise of the common-mode voltage). It
is this common-mode elevation which destroys your out-of-building
communications interfaces. With everything in the building coming to
2000 volts above your neighbors (including your local telephone
operating company), any common-mode paths will be severely stressed.
However, especially withing the building, they will be less stressed
than they would have been if the mains were allowed to diverge from
the WHITE NEUTRAL.
3. Third level protection
The most effective common-mode protection is an Ultra-Isolator Trans-
former. It is also rather expensive compared to differential line
protectors and secondary Silicon TransZorb protectors. Although many
Ultra-Isolator Transformers were utilized during the 1970's by sensi-
tive computer installations, it was realized eventually that the most
damage to main-frame equipment was done by differential surges (main
to main on three-phase systems). The common-mode threat was seen as
too little to justify the cost and complexity of installation of an
ultra-isolator, which, by the way, can also be done ineffectively,
resulting in no net improvement in the level of protection. The
companies that make ultra-isolators issue complete and effective
instructions concerning their installation. The difficulty is in
getting industrial electricians to follow the directions. Thus for
the benefit of the main-frame and peripheral power supplies, for cost
effective purposes, a good differential surge eliminator inside the
enclosure of each system power supply is recommended. However, remem-
ber that the common mode is the most destructive to your distributed
data communications peripherals; unfortunately, to protect them you
must provide the entire computer room and distributed CRT terminal
load with an ultra-isolator transformer, or see that each unit is
designed to withstand momentary local and global differences of thous-
ands of volts on the signal returns. Even then, on occasion, only one
violator located in a critical location and tied to a non-isolated
power system elsewhere in the building can blow the whole scheme.
Theory:
Not much theory here. The entire primary winding of the transformer
may get lifted to 2000 volts, but the secondary remains referenced to
the computer room ground stake. The box shields around the the wind-
ings are tied to the stake, and short out the electric field that
might otherwise couple to the secondary. Saturation of the trans-
former core protects the differential mode. The differential protect-
ors installed in each power supply dissipate the surges locally and
since each takes a small part of the surge energy, no concentration of
damage will likely occur.
4. Fourth order protection
You may get surge protectors for all communication lines leaving the
building. Each will need a reliable path to a stout ground. (DEC
usually specifies that the computer frame GREEN WIRE ground be done
with a heavy gauge wire, and all surge protector grounds be separately
returned to the distribution transformer secondary neutral grounding
point.) You may add Silicon TransZorbs to power supply rails in data
communications equipment.
Theory:
If one of your comm lines gets hit, or gets involved in an induced
surge, the elevation in voltage not dissipated by the protector is
conducted through the internal diode clamps included in most IC line
drivers and receivers to a ground or supply rail, and thence to a
TransZorb (a back-to-back zener with a heavy silver anode and thermal-
ly conductive silver leads). If enough protectors are in place, the
common-mode surge is clubbed to death by the collective capability of
all peripheral surge protectors operating together.
And that about does it. Needless to say, if you do a good job of
protecting your site, and one of your neighbors gets hit, you may be
damaged anyhow by currents resulting from the elevation of your neigh-
bor's electrical ground. This is especially true in Hawaii (and even
more so on their mountain tops) where the ground is made of lava rock.
If you get hit by lightning, your entire site goes to 25000 volts with
respect to the surrounding neighborhood. This bleeds down to appx
2000 volts over the next 100 microseconds or so.
If you have several buildings to worry about, such as may be the case
for a university campus, putting an umbrella protector on every build-
ing will only cause the cloud to ground potential to develop to the
point that when you finally do get a strike, it will be a *real
killer*. It has been pointed out elsewhere that most lightning
strikes are from the ground up to the cloud.
Thus, More Theory (speculation):
I suspect that the mechanism is something like this: Collisions of
air molecules with each other and the things that make up the surface
tend to knock electrons off the air molecules. There are other charge
pair generation mechanisms as well, such as natural radioactive decay
of Radon 222 and its decay products. (This specific mechanism is not
my theory - see JGR Vol 90 No D4 Pgs 5909-5916 June 30, 1985, Edward A
Martell, NCAR.) The electrons, because of their charge, are sticky.
They cling to the surfaces of various semi-insulators (rocks and dry
dirt) and near the surface of conductors until enough of them are
implanted to provide a counter electrical field gradient to repel
later arrivals. The positive air ions are separated by thermal
energy, and molecular screening prevents the immediate recombination.
The charge separation is effected by the rising of the warmed posit-
ively ionized air.
Once the charge is separated, mutual repulsion drives the electrons
into the conductive ground layers. Later, as the air rises and water
condenses, positively charged droplets accumulate in descending air
columns at the front of the storm just ahead of the rising column. A
field gradient is thus established with respect to the ground, where
all the electrons are. As the ground is conductive, the electrons
follow the cloud until, with the aid of conductive moisture and the
turbulence of the rising and descending air column interface, leaders
are established and a strike path is ionized and carried into the
descending air. The electrons travel up the path in a flash (parts of
which will have oscillations at radio frequency) and then distribute
themselves (at a more leisurely pace, accompanied with local flashes
and secondary flashes) in accordance with upper level gradients until
there is nolonger sufficient gradient to ionize the cloud-to-cloud
paths.
Time scales:
Main strike and individual secondary strikes each about 10
microseconds.
Duration of ionized path, reversals and secondaries about 100
microseconds.
Duration of high altitude electrical coronae readjustment about 1
millisecond.
Localized differences in the final potential may result in some
reverse strikes from a few overcharged negative clouds to the ground,
or subsequently more numerously (after air motion), cloud to cloud
"readjustments".
Howard Hull
--
Frank Reid
reid@gold.bacs.indiana.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<24300016@silver>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!iuvax!silver!commgrpReferences:
<2559@ncrcae.Columbia.NCR.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!iuvax!silver!commgrp From: commgrp@silver.bacs.indiana.edu Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Lightning Protection Advice Needed Message-ID: <24300016@silver> Date: Fri, 18-Sep-87 10:49:00 EDT Article-I.D.: silver.24300016 Posted: Fri Sep 18 10:49:00 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 02:42:38 EDT References: <2559@ncrcae.Columbia.NCR.COM> Organization: Indiana University BACS, Bloomington Lines: 237 Nf-ID: #R:ncrcae.Columbia.NCR.COM:-255900:silver:24300016:000:12537 Nf-From: silver.bacs.indiana.edu!commgrp Sep 18 09:49:00 1987