Article View: sci.electronics
Article #18595electronic time capsule
From: nelson_p
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1988 18:45
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1988 18:45
56 lines
3315 bytes
3315 bytes
I was thinking about a rather off-the-wall project the other day
and trying to work out some of the technical problems involved.
I had in mind an 'electronic time capsule', i.e., a small box
perhaps set in a remote location where it wouldn't be accidentally
disturbed, that would remain in a dormant state for decades or
even centuries at the end of which time it would begin transmitting
a radio signal to call attention to itself (at least during the
day when solar power could provide a current source).
The two main problems I see to overcome would be long-term reli-
ability and how to count the time before 'waking-up'.
I assume reliability could be achieved by careful selection of
components to avoid things like NiCads, electrolytic caps and
other things that may leak or fail after a relativley short time,
especially as a result of the inevitable day-night temperature
cycling it would be subject to. Silicon solar cells and CMOS
circuitry should be pretty reliable if carefully tested ahead
of time to get out of the steep part of the 'bathtub curve'
and then well sealed against the elements. All design would
be extremely conservative.
Timing out decades or centuries is a tougher problem. I had
three ideas but none of them satisfy me:
Some modern batteries have very long shelf-lives (decades,
even). A CMOS gate input to sense the state of the battery
has such high input resistance that it would not appreciably
alter the shelf life. When the battery finally dies the
time-capsule comes to life. Main objection: too short a
time.
Binary day-counter. A CMOS binary counter could be powered
by a few 10's of uF of capacitance using some reliable non-
electrolytic capacitor type. The caps would be kept charged
during the day by the solar cells and would be enough to save
the state of the counters at night. Sensing the output of the
solar cells with a schmitt trigger would result in one 'count'
per day. A 16 bit counter would 'wake' the box up in 179 years.
Objections: If the solar cells were covered for an extended
period of time by a deep snowstorm, leaves, etc, the caps
would discharge, the count would be lost and it would have to
start over.
Built-in failure. Use a component that I *know* will fail
eventually like a Nicad battery or an electrolytic capacitor.
When it no longer holds a charge the box 'wakes up'. Objection:
the wakeup time is *extremely* unpredictable.
I know this is a weird idea but sometimes they are the most fun to
think about. Thank you in advance for any ideas this provokes.
--Peter Nelson (N1CHJ)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3a56593d.44e6@apollo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!apollo!nelson_p@apollo.uucpShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!apollo!nelson_p@apollo.uucp From: nelson_p@apollo.uucp Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: electronic time capsule Message-ID: <3a56593d.44e6@apollo.uucp> Date: 16 Feb 88 18:45:00 GMT Sender: user@apollo.uucp Lines: 56 To: sci.electronics@news