Article View: sci.electronics
Article #18853Re: Posting schematics...
From: David Ambrose
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 1988 19:53
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 1988 19:53
20 lines
1382 bytes
1382 bytes
In article <1332@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> max@eros.UUCP (Max Hauser) writes: >In article <1059@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> phd@SPEECH1.CS.CMU.EDU (Paul Dietz) writes: >>A recurring problem in this news group is the need to post readable >>schematics. >> >>WE NEED A STANDARD FOR EXCHANGE OF SCHEMATICS!!!!!!!!!!! I would vote for using either Postscript or CGM for schematics. Most graphics packages now take CGM and Postscript printers are very common. The Mac format is rather clunky for both rendering and using due to the translation steps. It is also harder to revise since it isn't object-based. Postscript to HPGL translators have been posted to the net so they should be available to all. -- ______________________________________________________________________________ David L. Ambrose, -- Digital Research, Inc ...!amdahl!drivax!dambrose DISCLAIMER: Don't blame DRI. They wouldn't approve of this anyway. r}ix NO CARRIER
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3194@drivax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!amdahl!drivax!dambroseReferences:
<1059@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> <1332@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!amdahl!drivax!dambrose From: dambrose@drivax.UUCP (David Ambrose) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Posting schematics... Message-ID: <3194@drivax.UUCP> Date: 11 Mar 88 19:53:25 GMT References: <1059@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> <1332@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> Reply-To: dambrose@drivax.UUCP (David Ambrose) Organization: Digital Research Inc Lines: 20 Keywords: schematics