Article View: sci.electronics
Article #18855Re: low power license free packet?
From: Avatar
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 1988 20:33
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 1988 20:33
50 lines
3114 bytes
3114 bytes
In article <927@unccvax.UUCP> dya@unccvax.UUCP (Edison Carter) writes:
>***** PROPOSAL *****
>
> However, since there seems to be a strong low power packet
>faction out there, I do have a proposal:
>
> 3) Move low power packet to the band occupied by the FM2 proposal
>(220 to 225 mHz)
>
Did you happen to research what this band is currently allocated for? 220
is an allocation to the Amateur Service. It has been the target of a large
number of spectrum-raiders, lately, and FM2 has recently been denied. No
one in the Ham circles will support this proposal, it's that simple.
> 4) Allow low power packet to operate between channels 4 and 5.
> 5) Allow low power packet on the ISM (Industrial, Scientific
>and Medical) frequencies.
>
Sure. Why not? ;-) Don't hold your breath...
> I don't want a shouting match either, but the encroachment of
>the UHF broadcast spectrum is a matter which I will highly defend,
>as a licensed broadcaster who is taking the risk to serve the public
>interest.
>
Fine. No shouting. How about a quiet little discussion about just exactly
where the broadcast industry derived it's authority from, regarding the
move below 200 meters? Are you even aware of the history surrounding this?
Your *almighty* broadcast industry invaded the short-wave spectrum illegally,
using frequencies, at will, that were designated as part of the Amateur
service. No arrests, no fines, nothing like that...the broadcast industry
just paid-off the government and bought huge chunks of spectrum. Public
interest? Come on. It's pure profit-motive to you guys, the bs about you
serving the public interest is a load because there is so little real
competition in broadcasting..even the Cable franchises were perceived as a
threat. Don't pretend, go research the spectrum allocations a little.
> What about spread spectrum in the lower sideband?
>
What about it? Spread-spectrum is the 'little-darling' of the NSA, even
Amateurs are not allowed a free hand in using this mode. You think the
Powers-that-Be are going to seriously consider allowing unlicensed ops
to send data at high speeds using this technique? Do you believe in the
Tooth-Fairy? ;-)
--
-Avatar-> (aka: Erik K. Sorgatz) KB6LUY +-------------------------+
Citicorp(+)TTI *----------> panic trap; type = N+1 *
3100 Ocean Park Blvd. (213) 450-9111, ext. 2973 +-------------------------+
Santa Monica, CA 90405 {csun,philabs,randvax,trwrb}!ttidca!ttidcb!sorgatz **
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2076@ttidca.TTI.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!linus!philabs!ttidca!sorgatzReferences:
<17327@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> <1004@bcd-dyn.UUCP> <4726@ecsvax.UUCP> <5661@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <927@unccvax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!linus!philabs!ttidca!sorgatz From: sorgatz@ttidca.TTI.COM ( Avatar) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: low power license free packet? Message-ID: <2076@ttidca.TTI.COM> Date: 11 Mar 88 20:33:38 GMT References: <17327@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> <1004@bcd-dyn.UUCP> <4726@ecsvax.UUCP> <5661@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <927@unccvax.UUCP> Reply-To: sorgatz@ttidcb.tti.com (Erik Sorgatz - Avatar) Organization: Citicorp/TTI, Santa Monica Lines: 49 Keywords: poachers keep out! Summary: point of order re 220-225 Mhz