🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #19207

Re: Re: Low-power TV transmission

#19207
From: Alan Larson
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 1988 08:06
23 lines
1456 bytes
In article <2693@tekcrl.TEK.COM> jans@tekcrl.TEK.COM (Jan Steinman) writes:

-> If they are who I think they are, they have good reason to be somewhat
-> secretive.  They do not adequately supress the vestigal sideband, and
-> put out a 6MHz-wide signal, rather than 4MHz, so they will not fit in
-> the television allocation for the band plan.  Instead, they've plopped
-> the thing on 436, which makes weak-signal types furious, and possibly
-> violates international law and/or FCC regulations.  In any event, this
-> device CANNOT be re-crystalled for a "normal" channel without causing
-> interference, and CANNOT be operated north of the "A" line (roughly
-> Seattle to Green Bay) because of international regulations.

I don't think they are who you are thinking of.  They advertise crystals
for 426.25, 434.0, and 439.25.  They do not mention 436 MHz.

By the way, being on 436 should be little trouble to the weak signal
activity on 432.1.

	Alan


p.s.  The only bad think I can think of to say about them is that
      they still ship with UPS.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <17434@sri-unix.SRI.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!husc6!sri-unix!larson
References: <2693@tekcrl.TEK.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!husc6!sri-unix!larson
From: larson@unix.SRI.COM (Alan Larson)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.ham-radio
Subject: Re: Re: Low-power TV transmission
Message-ID: <17434@sri-unix.SRI.COM>
Date: 1 Jun 88 08:06:11 GMT
References: <2693@tekcrl.TEK.COM>
Reply-To: larson@unix.sri.com (Alan Larson)
Organization: SRI, Menlo Park, CA.
Lines: 23