Article View: sci.electronics
Article #19285Re: 7805 regulator
From: David DiGiacomo
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 1988 02:45
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 1988 02:45
22 lines
1536 bytes
1536 bytes
In article <22117@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes:
>In article <5030002@hpvcla.HP.COM> johne@hpvcla.HP.COM (John Eaton) writes:
>>< I have a question about the MC7805 5V 1A regulator. Can you parallel
>>< two of these devices together to derive a higher current?
>>In a word, NO. Unless they are extremely well matched then one will wind up
>>with most of the load and the other will have very little. The best way is
>
>I had a friend in college do this. I was skeptical but it worked fine.
>
>What is the problem with one taking most of the load? They are over
>current and temperature protected anyway.
They are not protected from reverse current into the output. I have
personally blown them up by wiring them backward. Even hanging a BFC
("big capacitor") on the output can be bad news; you are supposed to have
a reverse diode across the regulator to discharge it.
What is the problem with buying a 323K or the new wave 5A/10A versions?
P.S. I'm sure there is more than anyone would ever want to know on this
subject printed on fine quality newsprint in the National regulator
handbook.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<56936@sun.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!oliveb!sun!davidReferences:
<592@picuxa.UUCP> <5030002@hpvcla.HP.COM> <22117@amdcad.AMD.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!oliveb!sun!david From: david@sun.uucp (David DiGiacomo) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: 7805 regulator Message-ID: <56936@sun.uucp> Date: 17 Jun 88 02:45:52 GMT References: <592@picuxa.UUCP> <5030002@hpvcla.HP.COM> <22117@amdcad.AMD.COM> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Mtn View, CA Lines: 21