Re: Apology, further Explanation on EDIF EXAMPLES

Article View: sci.electronics

Article #19829

#19829

From: Mike Waters
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1988 15:34

23 lines
1555 bytes

In article <1563@oakhill.UUCP> murf@oakhill.UUCP (Steve Murphy) writes:
>The files aren't guaranteed valid EDIF because they come with special props
>defined by the Technical Subcommittee, and the style is also defined, in order
>to make EDIF implementable NOW. The next version of EDIF may well incorporate
>the things done now, but that's LATER.

Steve,
    I haven't had a chance to look at your files, nor at the draft of
the User Guide/Proposal that you folks have done. Can we (ALL!) assume
that these files conform to that proposal - less the standard errors and
ommissions kinds of disclaimers of course. If thats true then it will
help me for one in testing the proposal.

    Do these files relate to the 8 way vendor transfer we saw at Edif
World?       

    I am posting this since I think the answers would be of general
interest to everyone.
-- 
Mike Waters                 (for your EDIFication)
Motorola SMART CAD Group - EDIF support
Mesa, AZ   ...!sun!sunburn!dover!waters
          OR   moto@cad.Berkley.EDU

Technical Details

Message-ID: <464@dover.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!killer!ames!ncar!noao!asuvax!nud!sunburn!dover!waters

References: <1563@oakhill.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!killer!ames!ncar!noao!asuvax!nud!sunburn!dover!waters
From: waters@dover.uucp (Mike Waters)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,comp.lsi
Subject: Re: Apology, further Explanation on EDIF EXAMPLES
Summary: TSC'd Draft proposal?
Keywords: EDIF, SCHEMATIC, NETLIST
Message-ID: <464@dover.uucp>
Date: 11 Oct 88 15:34:05 GMT
References: <1563@oakhill.UUCP>
Reply-To: waters@dover.UUCP (Mike Waters)
Organization: Motorola CAD Mesa, AZ {dover}
Lines: 23

Reply to Parent Message