🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #20029

Why not two hot sides?

#20029
From: Peter Bain
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1988 14:01
16 lines
1276 bytes
In article <4759@bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>It seems to me that it would be far safer to have each of the two hot
>wires be at +/- 55 volts relative to ground.  A grounded center-tapped
>secondary would do it.
>
>Touching both would be just as lethal as before.  Touching one and
>ground at the same time would be much safer.
>-- 
>Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi

The reason one side is hot and the other neutral is that it's a
convenient way to get 220 V.  You have two hot sides, each at 110 V to
a common neutral, but at 220 V to each other.  That's why you have
three conductors coming into your house. That way, things like
electric stoves, clothes dryers, heavy machinery, etc. can use the
higher voltage and lower currents.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <182@bnr-fos.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!bnr-vpa!bnr-fos!bnr-public!pdbain
References: <686@bnlux0.bnl.gov> <4759@bsu-cs.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!bnr-vpa!bnr-fos!bnr-public!pdbain
From: pdbain@bnr-public.uucp (Peter Bain)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Why not two hot sides?
Keywords: house, wiring, safety, single phase, USA
Message-ID: <182@bnr-fos.UUCP>
Date: 16 Nov 88 14:01:52 GMT
References: <686@bnlux0.bnl.gov> <4759@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Sender: news@bnr-fos.UUCP
Reply-To: pdbain@bnr-public.UUCP (Peter Bain)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 16