🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #20985

Re: X-10 schematics wanted

#20985
From: Greg Wageman
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1989 18:51
42 lines
2793 bytes
In article <1132@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM> del@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM (Erik Lindberg) writes:
>
>One feature I have always wanted, and none of the X10 devices I have found
>supports, is the ability for the computer interface to determine the
>status of the remote modules.  Example: my porch light, which I absolutely
>do not want turned off during certain hours, but don't mind if it is
>turned on manually during other hours.  Currently I have to program the
>unit to force the light on every half hour during 'critical' time. Not
>only is this inefficient in terms of timed events, but the porch light
>could be off for up to 29 minutes.

You are talking about closed-loop control.  Obviously this is highly
desirable.  The problem I have with computer-controlling X10 is, what
do you do about local-on/off events?  Even if you know what state
every module "should" be in at a given time of day, a local-on/off
event doesn't generate any codes to tell the controller that the state
of that module has changed, and should be remembered.  Consequently,
the controller does the wrong thing when it updates all the modules.

There is good news!  A recent article in "Circuit Cellar Ink"
indicates that the X10 control language has been extended to include a
"unit query" code and a "unit status" code.  This would allow for the
master controller to poll each module periodically to get its current
state, which still doesn't solve the local-event problem, but is
better than what exists now.  The bad news is that, as yet, very few
(possible no) modules reply to/generate these new codes.


Longish .signature follows.  Skip now, or don't complain!

Greg Wageman			ARPA:  greg@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies	BIX:   gwage
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:   74016,352
San Jose, CA 95110-1397		UUCP: ...!uunet!sjsca4!greg
(408) 437-5198
------------------
There's nothing I hate more than a Usenet posting which took three
seconds to compose and three minutes to type, glibly dismissing three
years (or three decades) of an author's work in three lines.
------------------
Opinions expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the author.
(And the author wouldn't have it any other way.)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <758@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!xanth!lll-winken!uunet!snjsn1!bilbo!greg
References: <1657@trantor.harris-atd.com> <6449@dayton.UUCP> <1684@trantor.harris-atd.com> <1132@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!xanth!lll-winken!uunet!snjsn1!bilbo!greg
From: greg@bilbo (Greg Wageman)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: X-10 schematics wanted
Message-ID: <758@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM>
Date: 20 Mar 89 18:51:30 GMT
References: <1657@trantor.harris-atd.com> <6449@dayton.UUCP> <1684@trantor.harris-atd.com> <1132@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM>
Sender: news@SJ.ATE.SLB.COM
Reply-To: greg@sj.ate.slb.com (Greg Wageman)
Distribution: na
Organization: Schlumberger ATE, San Jose, CA
Lines: 42