Article View: sci.electronics
Article #21201Re: Stereo vs. Mono: Q about AM Stereo
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1989 17:41
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1989 17:41
15 lines
1214 bytes
1214 bytes
In article <4046@bgsuvax.UUCP> klopfens@bgsuvax.UUCP (Bruce Klopfenstein) writes: >The other question is, do you think the FCC should leave it to the market- >place to determine technical standards? ... One problem with leaving standards to the marketplace is that in practice, this often means leaving it to the manufacturers. Believe it or not, maximizing annual profits is not the same thing as picking the best standards. In particular, manufacturers will seldom reject the idea of a standard on the grounds that it is unnecessary and silly; quite the contrary, each new standard means a new market to sell stuff to. The only major justification for AM stereo, really, is that it would sell a lot of new radios. It's a dumb idea otherwise. -- Mars in 1980s: USSR, 2 tries, | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology 2 failures; USA, 0 tries. | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Apr24.174150.1285@utzoo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henryReferences:
<4046@bgsuvax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Stereo vs. Mono: Q about AM Stereo Message-ID: <1989Apr24.174150.1285@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <4046@bgsuvax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 89 17:41:50 GMT