🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #22108

Re: AM Radio

#22108
From: Mark Zenier
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1990 05:29
18 lines
1441 bytes
In article <3044@optilink.UUCP>, elliott@optilink.UUCP (Paul Elliott x225) writes:
> Slightly off the subject of the original question (re: improving the
> transmitted frequency response), What _is_ the current practice in AM
> transmitter design?  I am familiar with the classic plate-modulation
> methods, but many years ago studied other methods such as using two
> unmodulated carrier sources, phase-modulating them, and combining them to
> yield an AM signal.  This had the advantages of not needing all the iron
> of the plate-modulation schemes, possibly better efficiency, and better
> fidelity.

One method, describe to me by a station engineer, is to jack up the
voltage by a factor of two and use a second power tube as a cathode
follower switch.  This top tube was switched with a 70 Khz pulse width
modulated version of the audio, and then filtered to provide the plate
voltage for the RF amp.  The filament transformer for the switching tube
must be something special.

markz@ssc.uucp
Technical Details
Message-ID: <447@ssc.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!uw-entropy!dataio!pilchuck!ssc!markz
References: <90026.012605TRM900@PSUVM.BITNET> <26374@cup.portal.com> <3044@optilink.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!uw-entropy!dataio!pilchuck!ssc!markz
From: markz@ssc.UUCP (Mark Zenier)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: AM Radio
Message-ID: <447@ssc.UUCP>
Date: 31 Jan 90 05:29:30 GMT
References: <90026.012605TRM900@PSUVM.BITNET> <26374@cup.portal.com> <3044@optilink.UUCP>
Distribution: usa
Organization: SSC, Inc., Seattle, WA
Lines: 18