Article View: sci.electronics
Article #22602Measuring Small Capacitances
From: Shishin Yamada
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1992 20:21
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1992 20:21
56 lines
2960 bytes
2960 bytes
Hello all, I am involved with a project that has at it's centerpiece a very small device with a changing capacitance that we would like to measure. The chief problems have been signal noise and other unknown capacitances. I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions or further ideas for improvement. Currently, our variable capacitance is about 1 pF, and it will change about +/- 10% (what we wish to measure). It will have some unknown input impedance added from input switching (multiplexing/demultiplexing) network which should be around 10 pF (and hopefully will be constant for pass transistor style muxing). We are currently trying to measure it using something like a 100 KHz sine wave input into the Capacitance and known resistance in series to ground, and measuring the voltage across the resistor. But we would like further sensitivity and less 60 Hz noise. We have two ideas: 1) Use a current-to-voltage converter (see below). Where Vout=R*I. Here we are concerned about the output offset incurred and the limited gain thereof. +-/\/\/\-+ | R | | |\ | I-> --+--|-\ | | >--+-- Vout /---|+/ | |/ === GND = Advantages: No problems with small input currents for good amp. Input held at virtual ground. Disadvantages: Big amplification of 60 Hz noise. Clipping. Large offset voltages. 2) We were also considering a bridge configuration, but we have unknowns in our switching system which greatly outweigh our variable unknown. Chiefly, a bridge configuration really sounds good only for its offset nulling, but this might be worthless since the variable might be swamped by unknowns. Is there a better way to do all this (measuring multiple capacitances)? Also, one last idea we've got is to try to make the input a tuned LCR series circuit. It would be similar to what we're using now (just CR seiers circuit), but we might also be able to eliminate 60Hz noise. Any experience/wisdom would be much appreciated. Thanks! shishin "squish" yamada squish@endor.harvard.edu division of applied sciences harvard university
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec1.202151.23062@das.harvard.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!endor!squishShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 105d97,d1ec04e0d42af7b5,start X-Google-Attributes: gid105d97,public X-Google-Thread: f8ff0,d1ec04e0d42af7b5,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf8ff0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-12-01 12:35:41 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!endor!squish From: squish@endor.uucp (Shishin Yamada) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,aus.wanted Subject: Measuring Small Capacitances Keywords: capacitance, cap, caps, measuring Message-ID: <1992Dec1.202151.23062@das.harvard.edu> Date: 1 Dec 92 20:21:51 GMT Article-I.D.: das.1992Dec1.202151.23062 Sender: usenet@das.harvard.edu (Network News) Organization: Aiken Computation Lab, Harvard University Lines: 56