Article View: sci.electronics
Article #4156Radar Jamming Revisited (Take-112 - Cut!)
From: Steve Sampson
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1990 07:34
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1990 07:34
279 lines
15436 bytes
15436 bytes
> Simon Travaglia, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand writes:
> I'm pretty baseline about how detectors work etc. Can someone explain
> or mail me how the theory of it works. (I understand the basics of
> reflections etc, is it Dopler-ish?)
> What's to stop you syncing in with the Speed Detector and sending
> back info to say that you are doing 500mph?
The radar uses a Gunn diode for the transmitter which drifts alot. The
frequency is unpredictable. Therefore you cannot measure it and jam at a
certain Doppler offset. The most popular techniques has been the AM jammer.
You use a Gunn diode and modulate the power supply with the Doppler shift
you want the radar to read. This does not work with moving radar, and is
very poor on stationary radar. The radar bandwidth is usually the Audio
frequencies, so 500 MPH will be out of band and attenuated. Probably should
stay below 100 MPH. If I was going to build a jammer it would sweep the
whole frequency band using just a carrier, probably with a couple hundred
Watts from a TWT :-) This would prevent any reading with a fast enough
sweep rate (can't lock-on).
The following is an article I wrote, it's unpublished except for once
being uploaded to rec.ham-radio. It's public domain.
----------
Police Radar, Detectors, and Jammers
Steve R. Sampson
April 1988
Introduction
The radar systems used by police as well as detectors used
by the public, have matured and become more sophisticated over
the years. Some radars even have cameras attached now to
photograph the speeders. The cheapest radar detector on the
market will outperform the detector of even five years ago. All
of them work as advertised, that is, warn of radar emissions on
two or three frequency bands. Where you spend your money is in
increased sensitivity and optional features. The old crystal
detector is fully obsolete and superheterodyne detectors have
become state of the art.
The Radar
The police radars operate in three frequency bands. The
first is X-Band with a frequency centered on 10.525 GHz (Giga-
Hertz) and 13.45 GHz. The second is K-Band centered on 24.150
GHz. The third is Ka-Band and is centered on 34.31 GHz. These
radars are not very sophisticated as far as frequency generation
and transmission go. They generally use a Gunn Diode in a tuned
cavity connected to a waveguide, circulator and antenna.
((Figure 1 ))
The circulator is simply a ferrite rod inserted into the
waveguide. The purpose of the circulator is to direct the
transmitter power out the antenna and the receive power to the
mixer. In older radars a Majic-T performed this duplexing
function. The circulator performs much better (by about 6 dB)
and allows much smaller antennas to be used. The mixer circuit
is also quite simple, usually consisting of a diode. The
reflected target frequencys are mixed with a sample of the
transmitter frequency (which comes from some of the power going
around the circulator) producing an audio frequency difference
which is directly related to the velocity of the target. Most of
the improvements to the police radar have been in the tracking
circuitry.
This type of radar is called Continuous Wave (CW). Both the
transmitter and receiver are always on so there is no need for a
Local Oscillator (LO). The disadvantage of CW radars is that
they do not measure range. For police work however, the officer
is only concerned with immediate traffic and they can visually
acquire the target. With the radar tracking the fastest target,
the officer merely goes after the fastest moving vehicle. This
procedure is not complex or error prone as you might think. If
an officer can't decide who the offender is, they can wait for
easier pickings or provide a warning to both drivers to slow it
down. The whole purpose of traffic radar is to keep the traffic
down at a safer speed and penalize those who refuse. The fines
come in handy when it comes time to pay for all those that have
killed or injured themselves (gas for the fire trucks and
ambulances, etc).
Doppler Effect
When a radar beam strikes a stationary target, such as the
ground or buildings, the same frequency returns as was
transmitted. When a radar beam strikes a moving target however,
the frequency is shifted relative to the speed of the target.
The faster a target is moving, the greater the frequency shift.
This resulting frequency shift is called a Doppler Shift. You
can hear Doppler shift in many activities. Race cars coming down
the main stretch for example, have an increasing frequency as
they come towards you, while decreasing in frequency as they go
away. The formula for Doppler shift in Hertz is:
((Formula 1 ))
The wavelength of the transmit frequency in centimeters can be
computed using:
((Formula 2 ))
For the police radar frequencies of 10.525 GHz and 24.150 GHz,
the wavelengths are 2.85, and 1.24 centimeters respectively. To
find the Doppler shift for each Mile Per Hour, simply substitute
one (1) for Velocity (V). This results in 31.35 Hz per MPH in
X-Band and 72.06 Hz per MPH in K-Band. A car moving at 55 MPH
would cause a frequency shift of 1724.25 Hz at X-Band (55 x
31.35). This math is done electronically using a frequency
counter and gate divider in the radar display.
To accurately measure the speed of a target the radar should
be pointed directly into the path of travel. The reason the Race
car frequency changes as it goes by, is because you are offset
away from the path of travel. The angle between you and the car
is constantly changing. If you get down next to the track, then
only one frequency will be heard as the car approaches and then
recedes. This principle is important to the police officer also.
They must point the radar into the traffic to get the true speed.
Any difference in angle results in an incorrect speed (slower).
The measured speed (Doppler shift) decreases as the angle
increases, until at 90 Degrees the speed is zero. An officer
pointing the radar at the side of your car would read zero even
if you were doing 200 MPH.
((Figure 2))
Engineers refer to this resulting speed as Range Rate. The
symbol for Range Rate is R (Dot Product, R with a dot over it),
and the formula to compute it is:
((Formula 3 ))
What this means is that the measured Range Rate is equal to the
ground speed at the speedometer; reduced by the radar angle. For
example a radar angle of 90 Degrees would result in zero Range
Rate (cosine of 90 degrees is zero). A radar angle of 180
Degrees, or pointed directly into the oncoming traffic would be
minus one (-1) times the cars speed, or the true speed (cosine of
180 Degrees is -1). The sign information of course is lost with
the Zero Hz IF (no such thing as a negative frequency).
((Figure 2 ))
The Detector
Since the police radar is transmitting a signal, any
receiver tuned to the same frequency can detect it. In the early
days crystal diodes were used with an oscillator. The diodes
were placed in a waveguide cavity and caused the circuit to
oscillate when the radar frequency was detected. I bought one
and the sensitivity was poor, with range less than 1/4 of a mile.
False alarms were also a major problem. Various circuits and
diodes were used and sensitivity slowly increased over the years.
It wasn't until the advent of the superheterodyne detector that
realistic long ranges became available. The comparison in
performance is not unlike a crystal radio to a transistor radio.
With the superheterodyne circuit, a mixing signal is used to
produce a high frequency IF (Intermediate Frequency). This IF is
then filtered and amplified resulting in much better sensitivity
and selectivity, increasing range and reducing false alarms.
((Figure 3))
The circuit complexity and microwave devices are still quite
expensive however, and that is the reason you pay about $150.00
for this type of detector.
One problem with the detectors is there are many X-Band
transmitters out there. This frequency is very popular with
intrusion detectors and automatic door openers which will also
set off the alarm. For this reason many detectors provide a
'city' and 'highway' sensitivity. What this does is reduce the
X-Band sensitivity while leaving the K-Band alone. In my
experience I've found K-Band alarms were 99% associated with
police radar, while X-Band has many false alarms in the city.
Every grocery store has installed the new automatic sliding doors
and the detectors can pick them out over a block away. By using
the 'city' position you can knock many of these false alarms out.
There is no way for the detector to determine whether it's a
police officer or a door; both emit a CW signal that look
identical. These sources of false alarms do not go unnoticed by
the police officers, and make a perfect spot to nab someone with
a radar detector.
The detectors have good sensitivity from behind also. Sooner or
later your detector will go off, and like everyone you'll start
looking for the source. Check that rear view mirror every now
and then!
The Jammer
In recent years many radar jammers have hit the streets in
an attempt to create an Electronic Counter-Measures (ECM) war.
These are totally ineffective without a high power level. The
most common jammer found is called an Amplitude Modulated (AM)
jammer. It usually consists of a Gunn diode modulated by a
selectable frequency (Doppler shift). The purpose of this type
of jammer is so a police officer would not suspect anything while
you reduced your speed. It's very easy to see why this type of
jammer provides limited offensive capability however. Just like
an AM CB radio, 50% of the power is in the carrier. The
sidebands with the jamming information contain only a fraction of
the transmitter power. That's why most radio operators use
Single Sideband (SSB) radios now. On top of that, the newer
police radars lock on to the highest speed when confronted with
two signals of approximately the same amplitude. The effective
jamming power will probably be about the same amplitude as your
echo. The radar ignores the jammer and locks on to the vehicle.
These low power (100 milliwatt) jammers only become effective at
very close range. The fines for radar jamming can run a small
city for the rest of the year however, and basically there is
just no reasonable excuse for jamming tactics.
Conclusion
As we have seen, the CW police radar is quite simple in
design and has a significant ECM advantage due to its short
operating range. It performs its function easily with few errors
or limitations. The radar provides the police officer with an
easy method of measuring speed. The alternative is to put marks
on the highway, and using a stop-watch; manually calculate each
vehicles speed. This method takes time and gets quite boring
after a few minutes. Buying yourself a radar detector is easy
insurance that you won't be caught funding your state, county, or
cities motor pool. It's surprising that many habitual speeders
do not invest in detectors. Jammers are expensive and provide no
advantage over plain detection. The result is that jammer
manufacturers are now trying to sell their contraptions as radar
calibrators for lack of any other market. A two dollar tuning
fork will perform that function just as well.
----------
Figure 1
A Block Diagram of a CW radar showing the basics
Figure 2
A picture of aiming the radar and the Range Rate (R Dot) error
Figure 3
A Block diagram of a superheterodyne detector
Formula 1
89.36 V
Fd = --------
L
V = Velocity in MPH
L = Wavelength of Transmitter in centimeters
Fd = Doppler Frequency in Hertz
Formula 2
c
L = ---
F
c = Speed of light (29.9792458 m/sec)
F = Transmitter Frequency in GHz
L = Wavelength in centimeters
Formula 3
.
R = cos(theta) * V
.
R = Range Rate (Negative for closing, positive for opening)
V = Speedometer reading of target (true ground speed)
theta = Radar angle off the targets heading
---------
EOF
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11014@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!smunews!attctc!sampsonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!smunews!attctc!sampson From: sampson@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Steve Sampson) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Radar Jamming Revisited (Take-112 - Cut!) Message-ID: <11014@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Date: 16 Jan 90 07:34:38 GMT Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas Lines: 279