Article View: sci.electronics
Article #4221Re: naive question about RF propagation
From: Keith Ericson
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1990 01:17
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1990 01:17
33 lines
2101 bytes
2101 bytes
In article <28774@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@pepsi.amd.com () writes:
>We all know that AM broadcast radio fades when you drive under a bridge
>but FM doesn't tend to nearly as much. Why is this? Does RF at the FM
>broadcast frequencies propagate better? I thought the higher the frequency,
>the more it exhibited "line of sight" behavior. Or is it because AM
>shows the signal reduction more directly? Shouldn't AGC take care of
>that?
It's because the AM signals are low frequency = long wavelength and
those long waves can't fit into the opening of the tunnel like the
hi-frequency FM signals can.
Similar reason FM/high-frequency signals don't propogate as far as
AM//low-frequency:
Low-frequency Radio signal-----+
|
V
**
* *
Hi-frequency signal-+ * ^ *
_ _ _ _ V_ _ / \ *
XMTR | |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_/ \ * RCVR
* / \ * *
* * / MOUNTAIN \ * *
* * / \ * *
* * / \ * *
** / \ **
/ \
/ \
kEITHe
Standard Smileys Apply :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6699@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!keitheReferences:
<28774@amdcad.AMD.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe From: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.ham-radio Subject: Re: naive question about RF propagation Message-ID: <6699@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> Date: 19 Jan 90 01:17:32 GMT References: <28774@amdcad.AMD.COM> Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) Followup-To: sci.electronics Distribution: na Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 33