Article View: sci.electronics
Article #426Re: beryllium copper
From: John Whitmore
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 21:55
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 21:55
22 lines
1620 bytes
1620 bytes
In article <118.UUL1.3#666@vortex.COM> lauren@vortex.COM (Lauren Weinstein) writes: >Greetings. While going through some socket specs the other day, I noticed >that the contacts were spec'd as "beryllium copper". Unless memory >fails me, I seem to recall that beryllium is a horribly toxic substance, >and extremely carcinogenic. I don't think it's carcinogenic, but beryllium metal is (unlike many familiar metals) NOT ductile. If you hammer it or scrape it, it makes dust (not flat pieces or shavings), and beryllium dust is very toxic if inhaled. Beryllium copper is a high strength bronze (only a few percent beryllium), and IS ductile. A normal machine shop can work beryllium copper, and the only essential precautions are against getting a shaving in a cut (which is a common problem for a LOT of metals). Disposing of waste after machining is the only problem I am aware of (we use beryllium copper for a lot of low-temperature apparatus here). Normal handling of beryllium or beryllium copper does not expose one to any toxic danger (unlike lead, for instance, which is soft enough to rub off on one's skin).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov3.215558.22963@u.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!carson.u.washington.edu!whitReferences:
<118.UUL1.3#666@vortex.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!carson.u.washington.edu!whit From: whit@carson.u.washington.edu (John Whitmore) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: beryllium copper Message-ID: <1992Nov3.215558.22963@u.washington.edu> Date: 3 Nov 92 21:55:58 GMT Article-I.D.: u.1992Nov3.215558.22963 References: <118.UUL1.3#666@vortex.COM> Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System) Organization: University of Washington, Seattle Lines: 22