Article View: sci.electronics
Article #4276Re: U.S. HDTV STANDARDS DELEGATION SCUTTLES 1920x1080 COMMON IMAGE FOR
From: Mike McManus
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 1990 20:01
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 1990 20:01
44 lines
3191 bytes
3191 bytes
In article <2694@sactoh0.UUCP> mfolivo@sactoh0.UUCP (Mark F. Newton) writes:
> Well, I would suggest that we use the MUSE system. Why wait years
> and years for a system that hasn't even be finalized, and settle
> for something that will most probably be inferior. (re: American
> MTS system. Japan had theirs before ours, and we got stuck with
> Zenith's system, and they got rich.)
>
> Billions spent on competing systems, and for what? Pride?
> Selfishness? Come on, even some of the major Japanese manufacturers
> (Matsushita, Sony, Toshiba, for example) built their TV sets in
> American facilities.
IMHO, your analysis is correct: If we develop our own standard (read =>
different than the Japanese), then they will not be able to compete in our
market (not right away, at least). And just like that, we have a U.S.
"monopoly" (of sorts). And no need to go begging to Congress for import
restrictions. Gee, isn't that clever!
> Sure MUSE is not perfect, but Sony and NHK surely has made the
> system expandable, it's available *now*. By the way, I believe NHK
> and Sony is working on an NTSC compatible MUSE system.
And that's exactly the argument that folks will make, but I don't think it
holds up very well. Sure, if you wait a while and let someone else work the
kinks out of a new system/standard/process, you can always improve on it later.
"Yeah, but then if we just waited a *LITTLE* longer, it could be even better!
And a little longer than that... Heck, it'd be damn near perfect!" At which
time the pace-setters have long since left you in the dust, and you are left
with a "perfect" obsolete system. What a great idea!
As a disclaimer, I don't know much about the HDTV standards or controversy, I
just have a problem with the "but we must do it ourselves so that it will be
perfect..." mentality.
--
Disclaimer: All spelling and/or grammer in this document are guaranteed to be
correct; any exseptions is the is wurk uv intter-net deemuns.
Mike McManus (mikemc@ncr-fc.FtCollins.ncr.com)
NCR Microelectronics
2001 Danfield Ct. ncr-fc!mikemc@ncr-sd.sandiego.ncr.com, or
Ft. Collins, Colorado ncr-fc!mikemc@ccncsu.colostate.edu, or
(303) 223-5100 Ext. 360 uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!ncr-fc!garage!mikemc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MIKEMC.90Mar15130130@mustang.ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!think!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!boulder!ccncsu!ncr-fc!mikemcReferences:
<8Zx8Ip200ioEMMrHEF@andrew.cmu.edu> <132618@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <MIKEMC.90Mar9132613@mustang.ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.com> <2694@sactoh0.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!think!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!boulder!ccncsu!ncr-fc!mikemc From: mikemc@mustang.ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.com (Mike McManus) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,comp.graphics,comp.std.internat,rec.video Subject: Re: U.S. HDTV STANDARDS DELEGATION SCUTTLES 1920x1080 COMMON IMAGE FOR Message-ID: <MIKEMC.90Mar15130130@mustang.ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.com> Date: 15 Mar 90 20:01:30 GMT References: <8Zx8Ip200ioEMMrHEF@andrew.cmu.edu> <132618@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <MIKEMC.90Mar9132613@mustang.ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.com> <2694@sactoh0.UUCP> Sender: news@ncr-fc.FtCollins.NCR.COM Organization: NCR Microelectronic Products, Ft. Collins, CO Lines: 44 In-reply-to: mfolivo@sactoh0.UUCP's message of 11 Mar 90 07:35:47 GMT