🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3794@bwdls58.UUCP>, hwt@.bnr.ca (Henry Troup) writes...
>In article <5902@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> levene@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Robert A. Levene) writes:
>>In article <1990Jul7.094106.1004@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
>>cscon143@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
>>
>>>	electronics magazine I run across an ad for plans for
>>>	an anti-gravity device.  I was wondering if anyone has
>>
>>This is your lucky day!
>Cute pseudo-flame deleted.
> 
>I've seen those ads, too. I never wasted the money on them when I was a poor
>student, but I too would like to know that you get.  Maybe I'll have to try
>it.  (Obviously, you get 'taken' - but what kind of plans to they send?)
>--
>Henry Troup - BNR owns but does not share my opinions | Not one of 100% of
>...uunet!bnrgate!hwt%bwdlh490 HWT@BNR.CA 613-765-2337 | Americans


Well, I can think of a dozen good anti-gravity devices. Or perhaps, I should 
be more specific, and refer to them as gravity-opposing devices, since they 
operate counter to, say, Earth's gravitational field. You'll also not that 
gravity has nothing to do with it, but they're not going to mention that in 
the ads.

A few examples of such devices: airplanes, helicopters, air-hocky-boards and 
pucks, etc.

Clever (and not-quite-honest) advertising can describe these things as 
opposing gravity. That's what I suspect these people are up to.

___Samuel___
_________I_claim_and_accept_sole_responsibility_for_the_above._SjG.____________
<goldstein@aerospace.aero.org> | "In the space between our houses/ some bones
trimethylxanthine - it gets    | have been discovered/ yet our possession
 you through the day...        | lurches on/ as if we had recovered..."
Just ask William Bennett!      |                -the Church