Re: A conundrum about the AWG (wire gauge) table

Article View: sci.electronics

Article #5898

#5898

From: Tom Bruhns
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 1990 18:15

2 lines
543 bytes

Dunno how it all got started, but you should note that a change of
3 in gauge number corresponds exactly to a 2:1 cross-section change.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5170088@hplsla.HP.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!hp-pcd!hplsla!tomb

References: <2588@ryn.esg.dec.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!hp-pcd!hplsla!tomb
From: tomb@hplsla.HP.COM (Tom Bruhns)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: A conundrum about the AWG (wire gauge) table
Message-ID: <5170088@hplsla.HP.COM>
Date: 29 Aug 90 18:15:46 GMT
References: <2588@ryn.esg.dec.com>
Organization: HP Lake Stevens, WA
Lines: 2

Reply to Parent Message