Article View: sci.electronics
Article #6367Re: Is this legislation for real?
From: Brent Williams
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 20:35
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 20:35
51 lines
3106 bytes
3106 bytes
mcovingt@athena.cs.uga.edu (Michael A. Covington) writes: >I have been told that the following 2 things are before the Senate, but >cannot locate them in Congressional Record and similar sources. Can >anyone elucidate? >(1) A bill to abolish private consulting, "Senate 1706", mentioned by >a correspondent to Robert Pease in a recent issue of _Electronic Design_. >(There _is_ a Senate 1706, but it has to do with import duties on some >industrial chemicals.) OK, here we go debunking yet another piece of net.hysteria. This is actually IRS Code Section 1706. And it's not pending legislation. It has been the law for six years now. IT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY ABOLISH PRIVATE CONSULTING! What it does is provides a set of questions that are to be used as guidelines for determining who is a consultant and who is really an employee masquerading as an independent consultant to allow deductibility of mileage, business lunches, etc. They were trying to correct abuses where Joe Smith is a "contractor" that has only one client -- XYZ company, where he bills 40 hours per week. He gets to write off his mileage, his lunches, and a bunch of other stuff that employees of XYZ company don't get to write off. Unfortunately, Section 1706 also made it harder for people in legitimate long-term contracts (i.e., 6 months of 100% time) to compete without hiring themselves out to large "body shop" firms, because the guidelines set forth in Sec. 1706 would tend to suggest that they're "employees" of the company. That's why the "body shop" firms actually backed Section 1706 when it was first implemented as part of the 1986 "Tax Reduction" bill. (Memo to myself: Ask George Bush why if it was tax reduction, the dollar amount of personal income tax collected in this country more than doubled over the last 6 years. Sounds like another masterful piece of Republican doublespeak to me.) So Section 1706 does not outlaw consulting -- big companies like EDS, Andersen Consulting, as well as many smaller consulting companies are all having banner years -- but makes it harder for obvious scams. Unfortunately, it makes it harder for a lot of honest one-man consultants to make a living as well. But when have you ever known government to correct a problem like this *properly*? -brent -- Brent Williams/Cooperative Solutions Inc., San Jose CA (408) 377-0300 brentw@coopsol.com Cooperative Solutions makes Ellipse, a development environment for industrial strength graphical client/server business applications.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep9.203532.1597@coopsol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!coopsol!brentwReferences:
<1992Sep5.044504.20441@athena.cs.uga.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.folklore.urban Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!coopsol!brentw From: brentw@coopsol.com (Brent Williams) Subject: Re: Is this legislation for real? Message-ID: <1992Sep9.203532.1597@coopsol.com> Organization: Cooperative Solutions, Inc. References: <1992Sep5.044504.20441@athena.cs.uga.edu> Distribution: usa Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 20:35:32 GMT Lines: 51