🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #6402

project design/build time (repost)

#6402
From: John Haddy
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 23:19
69 lines
3295 bytes
I suspect that the local news feed chewed up my last attempt to post this. If it
didn't then please forgive the repeat post!

If you've seen this before, I promise that this will be the last time! I truly
expected that the the topic would arouse at least _some_ interest, however I've
only had one reply (from nearby), leading me to suspect that the original post
did't get very far.

Flames to /dev/null please.

Your forbearance is appreciated.

John Haddy

--------------

I would like to ask for opinions on this issue:

How long, on average, would you consider a project design/construction to take?
i.e. how many man-weeks?

I refer to a project capable of being designed by one engineer and constructed by
two technical staff.

I know this is an open ended question, with not enough details to answer
precisely; but I'm after a "gut-feel", not a project plan. Projects are
non-trivial (trivial means a circuit that can be knocked up in under a week or
two with no worries) and require an engineer's skill (i.e. they're not the sort
that an experienced technician would be expected to handle), often with
background research required (e.g. magnetic properties of toroid materials, ECL
circuit design, high voltage electronics [10kV-20kV at several amps] etc).

Project design time in this case refers to:

1	Project specification
2	Design and schematic capture, with simulation and breadboarding where
		necessary
3	Printed circuit artwork design (on a CAD system)
4	Printed circuit fabrication, drilling and loading (assume in-house
		fabrication takes one day)
5	Circuit test and revision/modification
6	Chassis work (hole drilling, PC mounting, etc)
7	Front panel design and fabrication (Scotchcal or similar)
8	Final test and shipment ('out the door')

Also, how long would a repeat build take. That is, use an existing design. This
would be equivalent to steps 4..8 above, without the circuit revision or front
panel design elements.

My reason for asking is that a director here is under the impression that the
output of one engineer and two technicians here has been lower than it should.

Personally, I believe that their output has been beyond expectation. However, so
as not to bias your opinion, I'll not quote the details now.

I will summarise if there is enough interest.

John Haddy

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

      |  _  |_   _   |_|  _   _|  _|              Electronics Department
    |_| (_) | | | |  | | (_| (_| (_| \/           School of MPCE
    ---------------------------------/-           Macquarie University
                                                  Sydney, AUSTRALIA 2109

    Email: johnh@mpce.mq.edu.au, Ph: +61 2 805 8959, Fax: +61 2 805 8983

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Sep10.231958.16925@mailhost.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!sunb!macadam!johnh

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!sunb!macadam!johnh
From: johnh@macadam.mpce.mq.edu.au (John Haddy)
Subject: project design/build time (repost)
Message-ID: <1992Sep10.231958.16925@mailhost.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Sender: johnh@macadam (John Haddy)
Nntp-Posting-Host: macadam.mpce.mq.edu.au
Organization: Macquarie University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 23:19:58 GMT
Lines: 71