Article View: sci.electronics
Article #6841Re: Needham Electronics PROM burner good/bad ?
From: Tracy Ching <SysAdmin>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 22:09
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 22:09
14 lines
1166 bytes
1166 bytes
In article <BtrGwv.Jqz.2@cs.cmu.edu> rwc@ius4.ius.cs.cmu.edu (Randy Casciola) writes: >>Howdy, >> I'm doing a small microprocessor project and need to >> get a simple PROM burner. >> Dan > >We've been using one here for about 2 months now to program 27C256 >EPROMS with no problems. The software is a little cumbersome to set I use it all of the time. I also have the 8031 87C751 modules and it works great. I think it is the biggest "bang" for the buck. Setting up the init file is a bit cumbersome but worth the $$ you'll pay for a burner for your small project. Needham people are very helpful and friendly over the phone. Good service and low cost together.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug29.220934.876@csus.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!csus.edu!target.water.ca.gov!tchingShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!csus.edu!target.water.ca.gov!tching From: tching@target.water.ca.gov (Tracy Ching <SysAdmin>) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Needham Electronics PROM burner good/bad ? Keywords: PROM microprocessor Message-ID: <1992Aug29.220934.876@csus.edu> Date: 29 Aug 92 22:09:34 GMT Article-I.D.: csus.1992Aug29.220934.876 Sender: news@csus.edu Organization: California State University, Sacramento Lines: 14