Article View: sci.electronics
Article #7306Re: comp.sys.yet_another_silly_newsgroup.i8051 :-)
From: Wayne Diener
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 1990 15:41
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 1990 15:41
61 lines
3565 bytes
3565 bytes
I would probably be interested....
>>PS I am an active UNIX and net user that does a lot of work with the 8051
>> microcontroller family. However there does not appear to be an appropriate
>> newsgroup. Any one interested in setting up comp.sys.8051 ????
>
>Why? If there is no traffic, creating the group won't make it magically
>appear. If you want to talk about 8051s, pick the closest existing group
>and start doing so. If the volume of talk about them gets too large and
>it starts to bother the existing inhabitants of the group, they will let
>you know :-), and *then* it will be time to give the topic its own group.
OK, let's start here! (I was going to be posting this question this
weekend anyway :-) )
There's an effort being made at work to convert from using strictly
ASM51 for our development projects to using one of the 'C' compilers,
simulators, etc. I would greatly appreciate any comments/suggestions
as to which products are good, mediocre or bad. Some of the concerns
that we have are (versus assembler):
1) What is the relative size increase we could expect to see in our
object code?
2) What is the relative speed decrease we could expect to see in
execution times?
3) What is available in the way of support utilities (i.e. make,
librarian, etc)
4) Are there compatibility problems involved in linking with modules
written in ASM51?
5) Etc. If I get a large response, I'll summarize and post the
results.
Also. I use the 8052-BASIC as my "jelly-bean" controller for most
of my home projects. Since the BASIC is so slow, I have to do quite
a lot of assembler level programming to make it useful. In order
to expedite this process, I've developed a kind of standardized
architecture which I use which includes the "extras" EPROM (with
the assemblers, editors, etc) from INTEL (I don't believe that part
was ever officially released by INTEL but you might be able to
get it from your rep. If there's sufficient interest, I'll check
with INTEL and see if it's possible to post an INTEL hex file of
the code. I also have the source code for the BASIC (same status
as the "extras") which allow you to do some neat calls to the
BASIC internals). To run it all, I wrote a Turbo Pascal program
which allows you to develop your programs on a PC (semi-interactive)
which allows you to store all your programs on your hard disk, use
your favorite editor, do all the handshaking for up/download of the
programs, a very primitive "make", etc. Again, if there's sufficient
interest, I'll post those items (or a whole package) that people
might request.
---
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| // Wayne D. Diener |
| // Spokane, WA |
| \\ // E-mail reply to: |
| \X/ To: isc-br!hawk!wddami!wayned@uunet.uu.net |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<wayned.9548@wddami.spoami.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!isc-br!hawk!wddami!waynedReferences:
<6334@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1990Sep14.153458.28449@zoo.toronto.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!isc-br!hawk!wddami!wayned From: wayned@wddami.spoami.com (Wayne Diener) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: comp.sys.yet_another_silly_newsgroup.i8051 :-) Message-ID: <wayned.9548@wddami.spoami.com> Date: 14 Sep 90 15:41:22 GMT References: <6334@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1990Sep14.153458.28449@zoo.toronto.edu> Sender: uueagle@hawk.isc-br.com (Eagle Proj UUCP login) Lines: 61