🚀 go-pugleaf

-Message-Text-Follows-
In article <1990Sep28.143653.23424@zoo.toronto.edu>, henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes...
>In article <1990Sep27.171111.5553@athena.mit.edu> chuck@mitlns.mit.edu writes:
>>>Motorola makes a nice CMOS 6805-family part in a 24 pin package.  Look
>>>for the 1468705xxx ...
>>
>> This is obsolete the recomended parts are 68HC...
> 
>Recommended for maximizing Motorola's profits, or for best results for
>the user? :-)
> 
>If you are designing something to be produced in quantity zillion a year
>from now, there is a lot to be said for using the latest and greatest parts.
>If you're a hobbyist dealing in quantity one, there is a lot to be said
>for "obsolete" parts -- they are generally cheap and widely available,
>which is (I hear) more than can be said for the 68HC parts.
>-- 

  All too true, but sometimes the comparisions is a little unfair. I find
when I look through a databook I usually drift to the newest/greatest/
fastest part that was just brought out yesterday. The HC parts have 
been out for quite a while and and the run of the mill stuff is cheap
and not hard to get.

   68HC11A2 was less than $20 dollars from Active. They now have $25 dollar
minimum on that part so you have to buy 2 but that's not bad for the
hobbiest. I think it is well worth the extra expense over the
68705P5 or R3 which can be had for about $8 or $12 respectively. The
poster mentioned the 1468... CMOS series which I find harder to 
to find than a 68HC11A2.

   The 68HC11 F series is hard to get of course, but it was only introduced
this year.


				Chuck@mitlns.mit.edu