Article View: sci.electronics
Article #7945Re: TUBE DESIGN
From: Andrew Karanicolas
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 1990 12:01
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 1990 12:01
95 lines
5161 bytes
5161 bytes
In article <1990Oct21.171736.9918@wsrcc.uucp> wolfgang@wsrcc.uucp (Wolfgang S. Rupprecht) writes:
>>In article <271c8c45-4b1.2sci.electronics-1@vpnet.chi.il.us> cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us (Crash Gordon) writes:
>>>Hardcore audiophiles claim that a tube amp sounds better than solid state.
>
>In sci.electronics you write:
>>Yeah, it's so hard for a transistor circuit to reproduce all those warm
>>fuzzy nonlinearities.
>
>;-)
>
>Actually the truth is probably that it is much easier to design a
>*bad* transistor amp than a bad tube amp.
What does this mean? It takes a lot of knowledge to correctly design a
reasonably complicated audio amplifier, regardless of the devices used.
>The real problem is that a transistor stage with high gain and no
>local loop feedback (ie. no emitter resistor) is *very* nonlinear.
>Much more so than a tube stage constructed similarly.
Sorry, but analog circuits used for operational amplifiers are considered
weakly non-linear otherwise they would not be useful for many applications.
Have you ever seen what happens if you run a vacuum tube amplifier into
clipping? Try it, it's educational. Also, connect to a spectrum analyzer
if you have one and you will see the rich collection of harmonic content.
>Many of cheap transistor amps run each stage at close to open loop
>gain of the transistor. They then fix the strong nonlinearities with
>a feedback loop around the whole amp. This is what I call the Phase
>Linear approach - shove a 741 in there to get .00000000000000001 %
>distortion.
One could only wich the distortion could ever be so low. What are you
trying to say anyway? The whole *idea* is to use the *high* transconductance
of bipolar devices in op-amp designs. This way, the loop transmission can
be large leading to small closed loop errors.
>It works quite well for carefully selected test
>conditions, that is ones that leave the every stage biased in a linear
>enough region of its curve (eg. 1khz sine wave). Unfortunately the
>first stage, the one that does the error difference subtraction, is
>very easy to overload if we task it with the chore of multiplying any
>error by 10**5. How does one overload the input stage? Simplest case
>inputting a square wave. For the time that the output slews from low
>to high the amplifier is *not* modelable as a linear system. Any
>small change in input will not result in *any* change in the output.
Use a larger slew-rate.
This is 1990. Stop using the 741 for everything. Open your eyes, and your
ears, and LEARN what modern integrated-circuit processes can now accomplish.
Also, check out the large signal square-wave response of a vacuum tube
amplifier sometime into a purely resistive load. A non-ideal step
response will be readily apparent. Try this with a reactive load also.
>This is the "transistor" sound. The sound of a bone-headed designer
>that just learned which end of a transistor went to which rail. ;-)
>
>The solution? Do a good job on feedback on each stage, and keep each
>one of the stages linear by using lots of local feedback. Don't try
>to patch it all up in the end.
>
Use a larger slew rate. Use modern op-amps. Do not use lateral p-n-p's.
Do not compensate your op-amp for unity-gain if the closed-loop gain is
40. Do not use a 741 for every single op-amp job in the world.
>Tube amps all have very limited gain in all the stages, and little or
>no global feedback. This is all becaues tubes have very limited gains
>at best. Notice how they force you to do a good job.
>
They do no such thing. Vacuum tube amplifiers sound more melodious than
solid-state amplifiers and that is *all*.
>You still need to add the "tube distortion curves" is you want the
>transistor amp to sound like real tube amp while clipping. You can
>probably use a large bag of diodes and resistor ladder to model this. ;-)
>
Why bother. Use vacuum tubes and you will be happier as will I. Personally,
I prefer not to clip my audio amplifiers. If you use solid-state op-amps,
get one designed recently that has a reasonable slew rate so the input stage
worries are not important. This does not mean that 2000V/usec slew rate is
needed for audio, unless the tweeter has to settle out within 25ns.
>-wolfgang
>--
>Wolfgang Rupprecht uunet!{nancy,usaos,media!ka3ovk}!wsrcc!wolfgang
>Snail Mail Address: Box 6524, Alexandria, VA 22306-0524
Andrew Karanicolas
MIT Microsystems Laboratory
ankleand@caf.mit.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5283@mit-caf.MIT.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!wuarchive!mit-eddie!media-lab!mit-caf!ankleandReferences:
<13b593cad136270a1244@canremote.uucp> <57@sierra.STANFORD.EDU> <271c8c45-4b1.2sci.electronics-1@vpnet.chi.il.us> <1990Oct20.220252.1269@zoo.toronto.edu> <1990Oct21.171736.9918@wsrcc.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!wuarchive!mit-eddie!media-lab!mit-caf!ankleand From: ankleand@mit-caf.MIT.EDU (Andrew Karanicolas) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: TUBE DESIGN Message-ID: <5283@mit-caf.MIT.EDU> Date: 24 Oct 90 12:01:40 GMT References: <13b593cad136270a1244@canremote.uucp> <57@sierra.STANFORD.EDU> <271c8c45-4b1.2sci.electronics-1@vpnet.chi.il.us> <1990Oct20.220252.1269@zoo.toronto.edu> <1990Oct21.171736.9918@wsrcc.uucp> Reply-To: ankleand@mit-caf.UUCP (Andrew Karanicolas) Organization: Microsystems Technology Laboratories, MIT Lines: 95