🚀 go-pugleaf

lars@salt.acc.com (Lars J Poulsen) writes:

>(2) 50 Hz vs 60 Hz scan rates.
>    This requires the memory to be dual-ported. To reduce the effect of
>    access collisions, you'd probably need to pre-fetch a line-buffer's
>    worth of data on each port.
The simple minded, cheapest solution is three-two pull-down. Then all
you need is off-shelf dual port DRAM.

>(3) Interlace versus non-interlace scan.
>    Broadcast video is usually interlaced to reduce flicker, computer
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Interlace will introduce flicker. The purpose of interlace is to
increase the temporal sampling rate.

>(4) Distortion due to 525-600-625 rate differences. Yes, it looks ugly
>    in broadcast, but you can live with it on home viewing by fiddling with
>    the height and/or horizontal gain.
This can be dealt with by proper sampling rate on the AD and DA
convertor. (This adjusts the spatial rate.)

>Am I the only person with family in Europe that would like to run
>videomovies through the computer ? Will this open up a new vertical
>market for Commodore, Apple or NeXT ?

With the proper design, such a stand alone system can be well below
$1000. I did design one of such system, PAL-to-NTSC and NTSC-to-PAL
convertor. It died in the middle stage of design, because of the
limited market demand.

						Regards,
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Email:        pshen@atrp.mit.edu                  |       Paul Shen       |
| Address:      MIT, 36-665, Cambridge, Ma 02139    |  Tel. (617) 864-3210  | 
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+