Article View: sci.electronics
Article #8925Re: incandescent light bulb life extender
From: Phil Ngai
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 1990 17:23
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 1990 17:23
13 lines
1186 bytes
1186 bytes
In article <4078@osc.COM> jgk@osc.COM (Joe Keane) writes: |The conclusion is that if you're dropping the supply voltage, or equivalently |using a higher rated voltage, you're making a mistake. If you're happy with |the reduced light output, then you should use a lower wattage bulb with the |right voltage. You'll use less power and also get better color. If you're concerned about bulb life, use a compact fluorescent. Most of them are rated around 10K hours. If you're concerned about cost, use a C.F. Over the life of the bulb it will pay itself back many times. I can not see any reason to use incandescents anymore, unless you are getting free power. --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Dec13.172348.20146@amd.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!veritas!amdcad!brahms!philReferences:
<4225@kitty.UUCP> <6213@videovax.tv.tek.com> <4078@osc.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!veritas!amdcad!brahms!phil From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: incandescent light bulb life extender Keywords: lamp life, economics Message-ID: <1990Dec13.172348.20146@amd.com> Date: 13 Dec 90 17:23:48 GMT References: <4225@kitty.UUCP> <6213@videovax.tv.tek.com> <4078@osc.COM> Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting) Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc; Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 13