Re: UL and CSA Approvement

Article View: sci.electronics

Article #9010

#9010

From: Dave Heller
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 1990 04:32

3 lines
791 bytes

In article <1990Dec16.210528.12149@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, forbes@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Jeff Forbes) writes:
> but appeared not to be UL approved. Is one approvement schedule more
> rigorous than the other? Is CSA approvement superior to UL approvement?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <685@wells.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!wells!k3tx

References: <1990Dec16.210528.12149@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!wells!k3tx
From: k3tx@wells.UUCP (Dave Heller)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: UL and CSA Approvement
Summary: CSA is far more strickt than UL--if it has CSA forget the UL - it's ok.
Message-ID: <685@wells.UUCP>
Date: 17 Dec 90 04:32:49 GMT
References: <1990Dec16.210528.12149@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: Wells Computer Systems Corp., Levittown, Pa. 19058
Lines: 3

Reply to Parent Message