🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #20460

Re: Flashbulbs (was something stupid and illegal...)

#20460
From: Unix Consultation Mailbox
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1989 19:50
19 lines
1484 bytes
In article <9844@sequent.UUCP> brian@crg1.UUCP (Brian Godfrey) writes:
>Modern cameras probably don't have provision
>to sync to bulbs. Cameras in the transition period (1950s to 1980s) did make
>provision for both schemes while applied to them. My old OM-1 (1975) has 
>a switch for "FP" or "X". "FP" is for bulbs (stands for Flash Powder??)
>and "X" is for electronic flash. My old Linhoff (I think it is 1950s
>vintage) has settings on the shutter for "M" and "X" sync. "M" is also 
>for bulbs, though I have no idea what it means.

And then there's the more common but no less mysterious "B" setting,
which I've always heard "translated" as "bulb", which holds the shutter
open as long as you hold the shutter release button.  Is this intended
for syncing to flash bulbs?  (I always used it for exposures longer than
the camera wanted to time itself, like those pictures of the full moon
shot with long f >= 8 lenses for ~30 seconds with Tri-X that we then
pushed to about 1600ASA...)


Phil Kos
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2818@osiris.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!haven!aplcen!osiris!consult
References: <9844@sequent.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!haven!aplcen!osiris!consult
From: consult@osiris.UUCP (Unix Consultation Mailbox )
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.photo
Subject: Re: Flashbulbs (was something stupid and illegal...)
Message-ID: <2818@osiris.UUCP>
Date: 19 Jan 89 19:50:32 GMT
References: <9844@sequent.UUCP>
Reply-To: consult@osiris.UUCP (Unix Consultation Mailbox (Phil))
Organization: The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Information Systems
Lines: 19