Article View: sci.electronics
Article #567Re: How can I restrict outgoing phone calls?
From: Larry Lippman
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1989 04:27
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1989 04:27
56 lines
3392 bytes
3392 bytes
In article <25535@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>, hughes@math.Berkeley.EDU (Eric Hughes) writes:
> >I don't know how many know this (for all I know, everyone does :^)
> >but a very simple way to make any TouchTone (tm?) phone ... not able
> >to dial out, simply reverse the red and green wires (easiest to
> >access them in the wall jack). You will hear a dialtone when you lift
> >the handset, but when you press the buttons, you don't loose the
> >dial- tone.
DTMF dial telephones manufactured within the past 15 or so years
generally work with either line polarity.
> This is true of older Western Electric dial pads, which were engineered
> not to produce tones were the line polarity was reversed. I believe the
> name for it was something like Tone Gaurd. From what I understand, before
> the phone company allowed subscriber line equipment, this polarity
> reversal was how they enforced touch tone availability. (Don't believe
> me, though.)
Sorry, I don't believe you. :-)
The original DTMF dial design was an _extremely_ clever design
which employed only one germanium transistor with a dual resonant tank
circuit to simultaneously oscillate at two frequencies. This was a
"minimum component" design, and Bell Labs engineers obviously deemed it
unnecessary to provide a full-wave bridge rectifier for use on either line
polarity. The low-cost, minimum component design goal was the sole reason
why the DTMF dial was polarity-sensitive.
In later years, Western Electric offered an applique consisting
of a full-wave rectifier and a couple of resistors on a small circuit
board to make the 35-type DTMF dials polarity-insensitive. This applique
was called a "polarity guard", and had a P-number designation (which I have
long forgotten).
Enforcement of DTMF service availability was performed solely in
the central office, and was accomplished as follows:
1. In the comparatively few SxS CO's which were converted to DTMF
service (through shared register-senders inserted between linefinder
and first selector), only DTMF customers were assigned to linefinder
groups so equipped.
2. In #1 and #5 Xbar CO's the DTMF class of service was effected by
assigning DTMF customers to only certain line link frames (or in
some cases only certain verticals within a LLF) which were associated
by the marker with only certain originating registers equipped with
DTMF receivers.
3. In ESS CO's, from day one, DTMF availability was always a parameter
specification for every subscriber line, and the denial of service
was therefore accomplished in software.
<> Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. - Uniquex Corp. - Viatran Corp.
<> UUCP {allegra|boulder|decvax|rutgers|watmath}!sunybcs!kitty!larry
<> TEL 716/688-1231 | 716/773-1700 {hplabs|utzoo|uunet}!/ \uniquex!larry
<> FAX 716/741-9635 | 716/773-2488 "Have you hugged your cat today?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3237@kitty.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!kitty!larryReferences:
<43afec9f.16321@apollo.COM> <25535@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!kitty!larry From: larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: How can I restrict outgoing phone calls? Summary: Touch-tone service availability Message-ID: <3237@kitty.UUCP> Date: 17 Jun 89 04:27:35 GMT References: <43afec9f.16321@apollo.COM> <25535@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Organization: Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, NY Lines: 56