🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1989Mar28.171856.21202@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>In article <13332@sequent.UUCP> roc@crg2.UUCP (Ron Christian) writes:
}>But just having the populated circuit card isn't enough.  One
}>needs some kind of cage for it.  How about making the card the
}>same format as... steady now... the IBM AT motherboard?  No really,
}>I'm serious.  There are now very inexpensive boxes available for
}>an AT sized motherboard.  Why not take advantage of that?  Note that
}>I'm NOT suggesting that the FHF card be designed for the X86 processor,
}>or that it support any of the PC busses.  Just that the boxes
}>for such a form factor are cheap and plentiful.
}
}Disgusting though the thought is, using one of the PC buses is also
}probably a good idea.  That gives you access to cheap peripherals that
}you don't have to build -- and debug -- yourself.  One can make a good
}argument for also providing a better bus for crucial things, like fast
}disks, but nobody is going to want to redesign *all* the interesting
}peripherals, and nobody is going to match the production volumes (and
}hence cost savings) of (say) AT peripherals.

While I like the idea of an (almost) free computer, I don't think it is
worth it.  Considering that you can go out and buy an *88 board for
under $ 100, and a 286 board for under $ 300, it isn't worth it to
design and build your own (ok, just build).  By the time you get done
buying the chips, circuit board, and other misc. parts, you will have
spent a lot more than that.   On the other hand, if you are doing it for
the _fun_ and the learning experience then it makes sense.



JB
-- 
Jonathan Bayer			      Beware: The light at the end of the
Intelligent Software Products, Inc.	      tunnel may be an oncoming dragon
19 Virginia Ave.				...uunet!ispi!jbayer
Rockville Centre, NY 11570  (516) 766-2867    jbayer@ispi.UUCP