Re: Superconducting Energy Storage

Article View: sci.electronics

Article #17604

#17604

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Tue, 26 May 1987 01:39

8 lines
843 bytes

> With these assumptions a device immediately comes to mind: a  
> Tank Oscillator.

Uh, don't forget that superconductors are not loss-free for AC, as I
understand it.
-- 
"The average nutritional value    Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
of promises is roughly zero."     {allegra,ihnp4,decvax,pyramid}!utzoo!henry

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8078@utzoo.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <226@ndmath.UUCP>, <7766@orchid.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Superconducting Energy Storage
Message-ID: <8078@utzoo.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 25-May-87 21:39:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: utzoo.8078
Posted: Mon May 25 21:39:49 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 25-May-87 21:39:49 EDT
References: <226@ndmath.UUCP>, <7766@orchid.UUCP>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message