🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.energy
Article #2127

Re: Car on water which instead of over 20 l/100km burns only around 5 liters per 100 kilometers

#2127
From: Phred
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:20
27 lines
2615 bytes
In article <48624ccf$0$1026$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>, Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
>News wrote:
>> "News" <killefitz@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
>> news:g3t1vh$vat$1@registered.motzarella.org...
[snip]
>>> "The initial testing of the heater was done on 15 litres of water. The 
>>> heater increased the temperature of this water in 10 minutes to over 
>>> 60 degrees Celsius, consuming 11 Amperes of 220 Volt, 50 Hz AC 
>>> electricity (i.e. 2600 watts in total). The water created a deposit of 
>>> limestone. The home circuit breaker was set at 10 Amperes. The current 
>>> was measured by the multimeter professional PR3051 (20A AC). "
[snip]
>11 Amps at 220 volts is not 2600 watts, but 2420 watts. If he cannot get 
>this calculation right, how sure are we about his ability to read a 
>thermometer?

G'day Sylvia,

Not quibbling with your criticism of all this stuff, but I don't think 
watts = volts X amps is exactly true of AC.  (But then, I don't know 
if 2600 is correct either.  We didn't do AC theory at school 50 years 
ago. :-)

Cheers, Phred.

-- 
ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6cf60hF3gs4heU1@mid.individual.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <283e371f-4645-41b2-9f95-87fce28c1c5b@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <1as0etl2jy6o0.1s9rpaj8onop0$.dlg@40tude.net> <485B7AD8.A8D998F9@hotmail.com> <a2256a68-0944-48a8-827b-b3d4f4837986@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <485D0BFB.313A202E@hotmail.com> <bb52b613-7a6b-4853-9593-5154defc0b37@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <g3t11f$qvf$1@registered.motzarella.org> <g3t1vh$vat$1@registered.motzarella.org> <g3tbvq$eop$1@registered.motzarella.org> <48624ccf$0$1026$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,fe97a6a1887e1216
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,fe97a6a1887e1216
X-Google-Thread: f95b9,fe97a6a1887e1216
X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,gid10b271,gidf95b9,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com (Phred)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.physics,aus.cars.offroad
Subject: Re: Car on water which instead of over 20 l/100km burns only around 5 liters per 100 kilometers
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:20:24 GMT
Organization: Just me
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <6cf60hF3gs4heU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <283e371f-4645-41b2-9f95-87fce28c1c5b@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <1as0etl2jy6o0.1s9rpaj8onop0$.dlg@40tude.net> <485B7AD8.A8D998F9@hotmail.com> <a2256a68-0944-48a8-827b-b3d4f4837986@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <485D0BFB.313A202E@hotmail.com> <bb52b613-7a6b-4853-9593-5154defc0b37@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <g3t11f$qvf$1@registered.motzarella.org> <g3t1vh$vat$1@registered.motzarella.org> <g3tbvq$eop$1@registered.motzarella.org> <48624ccf$0$1026$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
X-Trace: individual.net jSQanjs77GZ0NfBkOVAqWAPDZNcd+2Fqpmil+/dwYUxkY9MKoi
X-Orig-Path: Telstra
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8llqsfAA3BOq7/AVWDz7p432CPI=
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01