Article View: sci.energy
Article #2136Re: Gravity Wells
From: Peter Connor
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00
27 lines
2405 bytes
2405 bytes
> So the liquid pressure of lesser density and at lesser depth fresh water > will be lower than the water at higher density and further depth sea > water on the other side of the membrane. Then the difference in > pressures at the depth of the membrane is proportional to the difference > in water densities. But the power needed to get a flow going in a full > pipe is proportional not only to the pressure differential, but also the > force of gravity over the distance of the flow (not to mention other > factors such as average velocity). So even though there is an upward > pressure due to the density difference, wouldn't there still need to be > a differential greater than 9800 Newtons per meter^3 x the depth the > fresh water would have to travel to reach the exit of the tube, in order > to force the water out? (Density of fresh water is 1000 kg/m^3.) > > -lozang trinlae The pressure on the water at the bottom of the tube owing to the volume of water above it would be equal to that on the water outside the tube at the same depth, (imagine the water without the tube being there), the only difference to this equilibrium is the additional pressure placed on the pure water due to osmosis, this extra pressure forces the water up out of the tube. To answer another query on this thread the energy is actually coming from a reduction in the potential energy of the ocean as a whole as pushing the water out will of course reduce the overall sealevel. Peter Connor
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3455C2CC.57E3@open.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<344ECCC4.5EC75116@fan.net.au> <344F68E8.1064@mindless.com> <3450c763.3577320@news.oanet.com> <3452F147.150B@mindless.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e415,375cb76abe5101e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e415,public X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,375cb76abe5101e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public X-Google-Thread: 10c480,375cb76abe5101e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,375cb76abe5101e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 100065,375cb76abe5101e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid100065,public From: Peter Connor <p.m.connor@open.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Gravity Wells Date: 1997/10/28 Message-ID: <3455C2CC.57E3@open.ac.uk> X-Deja-AN: 285505999 References: <344ECCC4.5EC75116@fan.net.au> <344F68E8.1064@mindless.com> <3450c763.3577320@news.oanet.com> <3452F147.150B@mindless.com> Organization: The Open University Reply-To: p.m.connor@open.ac.uk Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.physics,sci.mech.fluids,alt.energy.renewable,aus.environment.misc