🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.energy
Article #2146

Re: Gravity Wells

#2146
From: rtotman
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 00:00
19 lines
1601 bytes
>> 
>> PS of course you could put the membrane only 500 or 1000 ft down and Pump the
>> water up.
>> Not quite so fancy (I love physics that looks like magic) But it would use
>> only around 30% of the energy of conventional reverse osmosis plants (no need
>> to compress the flow-by water) not to mention no containment pressure vessel
>> and hence the membranes don't have to be so compact to be cramed into pressure
>> vessels so they would be cheaper etc etc etc.
>
>John & Rhea Cook
>'Words don't grow on trees, you know' Me
>
There's just one snag to all of this.  The water around the base of
the tube will become increasingly salt and, unless there is a good
current down there to replace it with new sea water, the system will
stop working.  Sorry about that.  Ah well, back to the drawing board.

Rusty
Technical Details
Message-ID: <344f8dbb.4753209@news.oanet.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <344ECCC4.5EC75116@fan.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e415,375cb76abe5101e7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e415,public
X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,375cb76abe5101e7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,375cb76abe5101e7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 100065,375cb76abe5101e7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid100065,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c480,375cb76abe5101e7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public
From: rtotman@(remove-this)oanet.com
Subject: Re: Gravity Wells
Date: 1997/10/23
Message-ID: <344f8dbb.4753209@news.oanet.com>
X-Deja-AN: 282671645
References: <344ECCC4.5EC75116@fan.net.au>
Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.physics,sci.mech.fluids,alt.energy.renewable,aus.environment.misc