Re: Another solar manufacturer gives?up

Article View: sci.energy

Article #2187

#2187

From: jg
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 01:58

26 lines
2773 bytes

On 10/03/2013 9:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics jg <jg@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> No argument, but I have not heard of a single instance of trouble around
>> solar panels.
>
> Yet...
>
> With any luck you will avoid having something similar to our aluminum
> house wiring debacle and no houses will burn down.
>
>> In contrast, Australia had a govt program of installing dwelling
>> insulation (which would appear relatively harmless) and there were a
>> number of fires and deaths due to a range of factors.
>
> Which is exactly why the US has all those regulations about what can go
> into a dwelling, who can do it, how it is done, and inspections of the
> work.
>
>
>
So do we, but it doesn't cost $15,000 (or much more depending on 
installed kW's) to meet wiring regulations for a new dwelling. Which is 
the difference we seem to be talking in PV cell prices.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <wJR_s.4371$Ow3.2741@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g1ni56632wig.0!nntp.google.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!pit-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!61.9.128.156.MISMATCH!viwinnwcl01.internal.bigpond.com!viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail

References:

<20130107Gu3NiJy21p@TeWN>   <3qnkj8t5kf5ao8clede7cckvr058h0fd0g@4ax.com> <7h5lj8tv01m8sjv2v9psfcto4h4r0h2tfk@4ax.com> <cviq0a-jpi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <xby_s.4147$1k5.7@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <lbsq0a-kpj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <PBB_s.4151$1k5.1544@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <raas0a-4lo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <xCO_s.4166$1k5.1492@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <rtqs0a-9fq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <8_P_s.4362$Ow3.1741@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <ou2t0a-f9r.ln1@mail.specsol.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,10f0bb38ef4cad1b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,10f0bb38ef4cad1b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid1e31274bbe,gid9e5a772d74,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.180.95.97 with SMTP id dj1mr908741wib.4.1362880477292;
        Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g1ni56632wig.0!nntp.google.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!pit-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!61.9.128.156.MISMATCH!viwinnwcl01.internal.bigpond.com!viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
From: jg <jg@nospam.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.physics,aus.politics
Subject: Re: Another solar manufacturer gives?up
References: <20130107Gu3NiJy21p@TeWN>   <3qnkj8t5kf5ao8clede7cckvr058h0fd0g@4ax.com> <7h5lj8tv01m8sjv2v9psfcto4h4r0h2tfk@4ax.com> <cviq0a-jpi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <xby_s.4147$1k5.7@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <lbsq0a-kpj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <PBB_s.4151$1k5.1544@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <raas0a-4lo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <xCO_s.4166$1k5.1492@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <rtqs0a-9fq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <8_P_s.4362$Ow3.1741@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <ou2t0a-f9r.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In-Reply-To: <ou2t0a-f9r.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <wJR_s.4371$Ow3.2741@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:58:59 +0800
NNTP-Posting-Host: 121.215.39.155
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com 1362880476 121.215.39.155 (Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:54:36 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:54:36 EST
Organization: BigPond
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message