🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:31:55 +0800, jg <jg@nospam.com> wrote:

>On 9/03/2013 7:28 PM, Petzl wrote:
>> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:55:33 +0800, jg <jg@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>> Seem to of forgotten about fusion reaction?
>>>> It's suggested this is because of a lot of money to be lost
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing I have said to suggest I had forgotten that, or fission.
>>>
>> Fission seems off the agenda because of Japanese old reactors, even
>> their  "newest", 1970 reactors, should of been decommissioned years
>> ago?
>> Same for Chernobyl, old un-repaired reactors not maintained?
>> Finland uses these same Soviet reactors and have the safest nuclear
>> record in the World?
>>
>> Fusion (considered safe nuclear power) reaction for home use is
>> already available in "Northern West Atmosphere" like Canada, Alaska
>> has operating heating devices. These are plodding along successfully,
>> but not hitting the media so much?
>>
>> AFAIK only a 3D printer can make components because of accuraccy
>> reasons. Todays price of these printers though is now down to us$3500
>> so if one has a *TRUE* high speed internet [24 megabits per second
>> (Mbps)] or better one can download parts to assemble their own
>>
>> For larger scale electric generation (100MW+), here lies the problem
>> as they so-far, have to be really LARGE France is building one now
>> presently called TOMAK reactors
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak
>>
>
>Looks ok, at least an accident or leftovers wouldn't hang around for 
>decades or centuries.
>
Fusion is safe if something goes wrong there is no nuclear fallout
Fission there is
-- 
Petzl
"The Monarchy is important, not because of the power it wields, but because of the power it denies others."
Winston Churchill