Re: Wind and solar power

Article View: sci.energy

Article #2308

#2308

From: Scott Nudds
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1996 00:00

16 lines
1184 bytes

(Hans Pedersen Dambo) wrote:
: But the important thing is that those Rn-222 atoms that stay in the
: lungs will decay to radon daughters and the number of decays from the
: chain of radon daughters will be several times higher and also
: irradiate the during a longer period.

  This is an acceptable statement.  If you retract the statement that
  "radon does not cause cancer", we can end this thread.

---
Unlike commercial airliners, for example, reactors are simply too big
and expensive to fully test. - Rod Adams Jan 1995

-- 
<---->

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4raeio$fir@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <31d6346e.0@news.sbbs.se>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,34b9f912d079d225
X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public
X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,34b9f912d079d225
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ff,public
X-Google-Thread: 10607c,34b9f912d079d225
X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public
From: af329@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (Scott Nudds)
Subject: Re: Wind and solar power
Date: 1996/07/02
Message-ID: <4raeio$fir@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 163253062
references: <31d6346e.0@news.sbbs.se>
organization: Hamilton-Wentworth FreeNet, Ontario, Canada.
newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.environment,ba.transportation

Reply to Parent Message