🚀 go-pugleaf

On 5 Sep, 01:54, B. Real <B@..> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:09:42 -0700 (PDT), foolsrushin <dolomi...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >On 4 Sep, 23:55, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> In sci.physics B. Real <B@..> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:58:59 -0400, "Spaceman"
> >> > <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
> >> >>Spaceman wrote:
> >> >>> B. Real wrote:
> >> >>>> We are seeing at present  the construction of more and more large
> >> >>>> steam turbine power stations energised by coal or nuclear fuels.
> >> >>>> Tragically, these monstrosities directly waste about 70% of the fuel
> >> >>>> energy input due to unavoidable thermodynamic ineffeciencies.  
> >  [snip.]
> > > >>>>The result: no greenhouse
> >> >>>> gas emissions and practically no waste of energy.
> >> >>>> With energy becoming increasingly more expensive, I am mystified as
> >> >>>> to why such a device has not been developed already? A handful of
> >> >>>> uranium would keep a shopping mall warm for decades.
> >  [snip.]
> >> >>> I think Hitachi has a "Neighborhood" style one already.
> >> >>> It is large enough to power a couple blocks or something like that.
> >> >>> I forget where I saw it though.
> >  [snip.]
> >> >>Here is one link anyway;
> >> >>http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/12/toshibas-home-n.html
> >> > See! Trust the Japs to be first. Yanks and poms are too stupid. Not surprising
> >> > with idiots like uncle rectAL and Rod Speed around...
> >> > I'm not sure about using the thing to generate electricity though.
> >> > Thanks Spaceman...
> >  [snip.]
> >> Not likely you will ever see one of them since the whole thing was a hoax.
> >> Google Toshiba home nuclear reactor hoax
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >> Remove .spam.sux to reply.
> >That could
> >> > will require high pressure operation and still result in a 70% energy loss.
> >> > Maybe it has a self contained Stirling cycle engine so that all the remaining
> >> > energy is still available for space and water heating.
> >> > Anyway, I'm sure we'll see lots of these in the near future.
>
> >http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7654627/
>
> >Or even a lot of the latter in the future!
>
> >Again, quoted in Hoagland and Bara's 'Dark Mission'. Dr. Bruce De
> >Palma's 'Spinning Ball Experiment.' A metal ball spun up to 27,000
> >RPM, rose higher and faster and fell faster and further than a similar
> >though not rotating ball, arguably violating Newtonian 'laws' of
> >motion.
>
> >Whence the extra energy? They argue for a rotating time-twisting
> >hyperspatial gate, allowing spin-field energy to enter 3-space from a
> >higher dimension. Read their stuff! Compelling, testable, and clean,
> >too!
>
> \
> Hahahahaha! thanks for the laughs..

I'd be a little more circumspect! When I was 7, the only way I could
get books out of the adults' library was by having my mum or dad in
tow.

A book I thus got out was E. A.Abbott's 'Flatland'. I had to fight
with my dad, though, to get sight of it: he loved it!
Read http://www.ibiblio.org/eldritch/eaa/FL.HTM Enjoy, I hope.

Simply because testing things below one planck length is simply not on
the cards, I just accepted all the speculation, hype and razzmatazz
that accompanies modern physics: you arrived before you left is not
quite the same thing as you left before you arrived!.Problems of
ordinary language, I hope you might agree. Subsitute 'train'!

You need a sort of spation-temporal dynamic taxonomy to make any sense
at all of action at a distance. Only inferentially can an upper
dimension be investigated, though, as Hoagland and Bara conjecture in
Dark Mission, there may well be 'experiments' of an astrophysical
nature running now - all around you, with a new aether, too! Same
difference - in a weigh!

As they used to say at IBM, THINK!
--
foolsrushin.