🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:09:42 -0700 (PDT), foolsrushin <dolomite8@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On 4 Sep, 23:55, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics B. Real <B@..> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:58:59 -0400, "Spaceman"
>> > <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
>> >>Spaceman wrote:
>> >>> B. Real wrote:
>> >>>> We are seeing at present �the construction of more and more large
>> >>>> steam turbine power stations energised by coal or nuclear fuels.
>> >>>> Tragically, these monstrosities directly waste about 70% of the fuel
>> >>>> energy input due to unavoidable thermodynamic ineffeciencies. �
>  [snip.]
> > >>>>The result: no greenhouse
>> >>>> gas emissions and practically no waste of energy.
>> >>>> With energy becoming increasingly more expensive, I am mystified as
>> >>>> to why such a device has not been developed already? A handful of
>> >>>> uranium would keep a shopping mall warm for decades.
>  [snip.]
>> >>> I think Hitachi has a "Neighborhood" style one already.
>> >>> It is large enough to power a couple blocks or something like that.
>> >>> I forget where I saw it though.
>  [snip.]
>> >>Here is one link anyway;
>> >>http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/12/toshibas-home-n.html
>> > See! Trust the Japs to be first. Yanks and poms are too stupid. Not surprising
>> > with idiots like uncle rectAL and Rod Speed around...
>> > I'm not sure about using the thing to generate electricity though.
>> > Thanks Spaceman...
>  [snip.]
>> Not likely you will ever see one of them since the whole thing was a hoax.
>> Google Toshiba home nuclear reactor hoax
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
>> Remove .spam.sux to reply.
>That could
>> > will require high pressure operation and still result in a 70% energy loss.
>> > Maybe it has a self contained Stirling cycle engine so that all the remaining
>> > energy is still available for space and water heating.
>> > Anyway, I'm sure we'll see lots of these in the near future.
>
>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7654627/
>
>Or even a lot of the latter in the future!
>
>Again, quoted in Hoagland and Bara's 'Dark Mission'. Dr. Bruce De
>Palma's 'Spinning Ball Experiment.' A metal ball spun up to 27,000
>RPM, rose higher and faster and fell faster and further than a similar
>though not rotating ball, arguably violating Newtonian 'laws' of
>motion.
>
>Whence the extra energy? They argue for a rotating time-twisting
>hyperspatial gate, allowing spin-field energy to enter 3-space from a
>higher dimension. Read their stuff! Compelling, testable, and clean,
>too!
\
Hahahahaha! thanks for the laughs..