🚀 go-pugleaf

Below is the MRA.ASC + Update1 + Update2.

   ________________________________________________________________
   |File Name: MRA.ASC            |  Online Date :12/13/94        |
   |Contributed by : Joel McClain |  Dir Category:ENERGY          |
   |From : KeelyNet BBS           |  DataLine:(214) 324-3501      |
   | KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187     |
   |A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences|
   |--------------------------------------------------------------|

 The following requires the file MRA.GIF also on KeelyNet. The file
 MRA.ZIP contains both this file MRA.ASC and the image MRA.GIF.
----------------------------------------------------------------
                       ***** Please NOTE!!*****

This is a preliminary report that will be followed by updates with
more detail.Future versions will include various measurements of the
components used in the ciruit that is currently running.From all
appearances at this date, the circuit components will simply give
varying outputs and do not appear to be all that critical.

It was felt that this information should be released to the public as
rapidly as possible, rather than risk loss of the information or the
demo by 'circumstances' beyond our control.There have been too many
discoveries which have disappeared by not being openly shared.We
would rather risk being 'flamed' by other experimenters who actually
BUILD THE CIRCUIT than take the chance of the information being lost
by keeping it within a select group.

Our two primary fears are that someone will attempt to patent what is
intended to be a gift to humanity, possibly with an intent to profit
from others work or to lock it away, the other that it might be
suppressed in some other fashion.

Therefore, the widest possible distribution is requested, and
duplication attempted wherever possible.At the time of this
correction to the original file, we have confirmation as to the
numbers and others are working on the circuit on their own.Please
take this information in the spirit of how it is given, as a gift to
humanity.

The inventors are Joel McClain and Norman Wootan. You can contact
them via KeelyNet or directly.

The circuit is being tested at various levels and attempts at
duplication are under way.At this point, there is only one circuit.We
will openly post other successful duplications or failures.Please
feel free to try it yourself.The cost is minimal.

One other point, the crystal transducer was thought to be barium
titanate and there is reason to believe it is in fact titanium
zirconate.These are disc shaped, about 3" in diamter with a 1"
diameter hole in the center.The disc is about 3/8" thick and is
coated with silver on both sides.Thank you for your open-
mindedness.They are advertised in the back of many electronics
magazines for about $5 each.We have access to a small stock and might
offer them for experiments should people ask for them.

 Good luck and SEIZE THE DAY!

-----------------------------------------------------------
             The Magnetic Resonance Amplifier (MRA)

Discovered and proven December 12, 1994 and shared with the world on
December 13, 1994

 by Joel McClain and Norman Wootan

MRA is the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier.With low level ultrasonic
input signals, the MRA produces usable direct current power at levels
above unity. This circuit is based upon the work and theories of John
Ernst Worrell Keely, and is offered into the public domain in his
memory.

Without lengthy discussion about the ether, tetrahedral geometric
virtual rotation, mass aggregate resonance or the rule of nines, it
is possible to understand this circuit as basically a tuned magnetic
and quartz amplifier.

However, it WAS necessary to study those subjects in order to design
and build the MRA, so if you want to fully realize how it works,
avail yourself of the files on KeelyNet which contain all of that and
much, much more.

In the schematic, MRA.GIF, there is a tunable low power oscillator,
which supplies a signal to one side of a barium titanite
transducer.The opposite side of the transducer is connected to a
primary coil, which is wrapped around a barium ferrite magnet
core.The opposite end of the primary goes back to the oscillator.

A secondary is wrapped around the primary, and is connected to an
ordinary bridge rectifier, and the output of the bridge is applied to
a DC load.A filter capacitor can be used on the output of the bridge,
and was used on the MRA which we built.Additionally, a load resistor
across the capacitor will keep the output DC from getting too high as
the circuit is tuned.We found that a 30 ohm, 10 watt resistor was
sufficient.

Once this has been assembled, put a voltmeter across the output
resistor to monitor the voltage rise as the circuit is tuned.Adjust
the oscillator frequency to provide the highest DC output.During this
process, be aware that the voltages across the piezo and the coil
will be VERY MUCH HIGHER than the signal level which you are
applying.We have seen combined voltages of almost 1000VAC with only
30VAC of signal input.

When the circuit is tuned, the magnet will be "singing" at around
8000 to 11000Hz.If the piezo sings, you are exceeding its power
capabilities, and will need to reduce the number of turns on your
primary.The frequency that resonates both the piezo and the magnet at
optimum resonance will be three times (three octaves above) the
frequency at which the magnet is singing. This is the nine harmonics
that are mentioned in the Rule of Nines.

To test the circuit, place a precision, high wattage, low ohm
resistor in series with the output from the oscillator to the piezo,
and measure the voltage drop.It should be very small, less than
0.1VAC.Use this value to determine current in the series circuit, and
then calculate power.

Next, measure the DC voltage across your output load resistor, and
once again calculate power.You should be between three to four times
above the previously calculated input power.

Once the circuit is in operation, you will note that the voltage will
vary by 0.1VDC or more, depending upon the time of day.This is due to
the nature of etheric forces inherent to the earth's magnetic
field.Watch for peak voltage at or before sunrise.

In our circuit, we measured 0.084VAC drop across a two ohm series
resistor, for a total of 0.685W dissipation in the primary.With this,
we attained 2.75W of output power, and used this to drive a lamp and
a motor.Increasing the signal voltage had the effect of decreasing
the primary current while boosting output power, thus improving the
power gain ratio.We believe that larger power systems can be built by
using larger coils, more piezos, and a lower frequency, as long as
the aggregate combination is within the resonant frequency range of
the components.

The MRA is essentially a means of releasing the electrical energy
stored in magnets.As such, it is an AC battery with DC output.It can
be used for a portable, self-charging power supply with a solid state
oscillator and rechargable battery.For those who want a synopsis of
the technology, the following paragraphs are offered, but it is
strongly suggested that you follow up this reading with a more
thorough study of the KeelyNet files.

Matter = energy.To change the matter, change the energy.Creating of a
magnet achieved by a process which causes the matter to be both
expanded and compressed at the same time, with the result that a
magnet is in a constant state of collapse.This is why magnets attract
material with similar lattice structures, as they attempt to fill the
energy void which created them.The "domains" of the magnet are fixed
after the process of magnetization, and the only way to extract
electrical energy is to physically spin a coil relative to a magnet.

However, it is also possible to induce virtual rotation by applying
the resonant frequency of the magnet, which causes the lattices and
the domains to vibrate.However, the power required to do this is
greater than the energy released by the virtual rotation.Therefore,
it is necessary to increase the vibration without using excessive
current.

The piezo has a virtually inexhaustable supply of free electrons, and
it releases them when it is stressed.Using the piezo in series with
the primary coil will almost eliminate primary current, because it is
voltage which stresses the piezo, not current.Therefore, the piezo
can be stressed with very little actual power, and provide the
current to the primary coil, which vibrates the domains of the
magnet.

The piezo is the catalyst for the circulating current with the
primary coil. The circulating current is additive, and this is the
reason for the high potentials developed across both the piezo and
the primary coil.

It is at this point that resonance becomes important.You MUST have
three octaves of separation between the magnet resonant frequency and
the signal applied to the piezo.The circulating current is rich in
harmonics, and this is necessary for the operation of the circuit.

Although the circuit is simple, it utilizes the concepts of PHI, of
virtual rotation, of tetrahedral geometry, piezo and transformer
theory, and electrical knowledge.It is not suggested as a beginner
project as a result of the high voltages present.For engineers and
technicians of experience, it may be difficult to accept that the MRA
is above unity.The ramifications are emormous.Hopefully, it will help
to build a better world.
--------------------------------------------------------

Vangard Note

This device incorporates power multiplication principles using
multiple resonances as claimed by Keely and Hendershott.It also
corresponds in some ways with Floyd Sweet's VTA and Joe Parr's energy
spheres from pyramids.

Joel called Sunday night in an excited state.He and Norman took turns
explaining what they had achieved using this circuit.The power input
measurements were about 600mWatts and yet the circuit was generating
about 2.5 Watts on the output.Norman hooked up a DC motor and he said
it was spinning like crazy in addition to a light bulb glowing
brightly.

Norman was laughing and said they'd beat Harold Puthoffs' One Watt
Challenge as issued at the 1994 ISNE conference in Denver.This has
created quite a bit of excitement and Puthoff now has a FAX'd copy of
the circuit.No doubt it will be everywhere in a very short time.The
hope by Joel and Norman is that others will duplicate the initial
effect and be able to expand on it to derive useful power.

Sweet claimed something on the order of 1:3,000,000 over-unity.The
input power to his device was 10 VAC at 29uamps (290mWatts).The
output had been loaded to as high as 3,000 Watts.

The initial MRA circuit is something on the order of 1:5 and is
believed to be scalable.Joel says the coil he had wound around the
barium ferrite magnet was not in the least precision and he is of the
mind that a huge coil surrounding the magnet will produce a
proportional increase in power.

Early talks with various KeelyNetters about the Sweet circuit led
many of us to believe that Barium, when excited, rings for a long
time when the exciter is removed.At the ISNE conference, Don Watson
confirmed this with his analogy of glowing luciferase as found in
fireflys or other phosphorescent materials.A weak stimulation
continues to produce light for a time after the stimulation is
removed.

So, here is a wonderful opportunity to build a pioneering device.If
you have questions or suggestions, you may direct them to Joel
McClain or Norman Wootan at KeelyNet.

I think they both need to be commended for their willingness to share
what many would keep proprietary or die with the
secret
                   .............>>>Jerry

------------------------------------------------------

*********************************************************************
Message 9850
DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 09:31From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
To     : ALL
Subject: MRA Input
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
For those who plan to build their own MRA, you will have to use
sine wave signal wave input.  I've tried square wave, and although
the magnet will "sing", the output DC power will be below unity.
I believe this is because the circuit can't "breathe" evenly with
square wave input.
===============================================================================
Message 9875
DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 19:23
From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
To     : ALL
Subject: MRA "Tech Bulletin"
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

If you build your own MRA, there are a few things that you should know that
aren't in the file yet...they're still being discovered.

First of all, don't wear your quartz watch while you work on the MRA,as the
quartz will react with the circuit and run slow.  Secondly, avoid using scopes
for anything except occasional waveform checks, because there is so much flux
in the air that it will buildup on the scope and skew your display.

Thirdly, use a hand-heletr as opposed to a panel meter if you can because the
flux buildup on a panel meter chassis will destroy the front end
transistors...I know, as I did it.

Fourth, the constant ringing will drive you nuts and give you a head-ache in
short order.

Fifth, if you take the piezo out of the circuit after it has been on for a
while, as it cools, it will keep building up charges, and will bite you when
you pick it up.

Sixth, if the piezo screeches, shut the MRA down and wait for a while before
you start it up again.  The piezos are bad tempered if you overdrive them, and
will sulk for a while before they work right.

This ain't your daddy's oldsmobile...we're still learning to drive it so there
may be more of these "field bulletins".

Joel
=============================================================================== Message 9876                                   DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 20:00
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : BILL BEATY
Subject: MRA
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Bill:
Point well taken.  We will prove out the circuit and you will
know by the message traffic as to our progress.  We all value your
input and guidance therefore jump in and help us out as we sort this
beast out.  I have a very similar circuit to Joel's and we compare
notes constantly. I wound a coil on a barium ferrite magnet with my
windings running parallel to the "bloch wall" where Joel's coil has the
windings running perpendicular to the "bloch wall".
My I/O ratio so far as I can determine is around 12:1 which is some
improvement but we need testing.  Bert
Pool just left to go and build a similar circuit so the more folks that
build, test and improve on the design the better.

Thanks again.

Norm
===============================================================================

Message 9882
DATE/TIME: 12/14/94 08:17
From: NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : ALL
Subject: MRA (Tech Bulletin)
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Since Joel and I have created a lot of interest in the MRA device we will
place everything on line so that no "stone is left unturned".  Long ago I saw
a sci-fi movie of a suitcase size device that you could plug any size AC load
into it and it would power it with no problem.  I dreamed of building such a
device by imploying a block of natural quartz with a mechanical oscillator
attached to all faces (Tesla oscillator) to force the quartz to yield free
electrons.  I envisioned the output (high voltage) to be stored in a capacitor
bank (1 kilo joule) them the output going into an inverter circuit and
stepdown transformer to take this piezo generated voltage down to a useful AC
voltage.  Now Joel and I have combined this cture of a magnet to sum the
outputs of the piezo effect and the ferro-resonant effect to give an
over-unity total at the bridge rectifier.  Last night Bert Pool came over to
gather up the needed supplies to build a prototype circuit to do independent
evaluation.  After I had run the circuit through the paces noting the outputs
and thoroughly discussing what we thought was going on here I turned off the
meters, scopes and the signal generator and finally went to bed. Well I woke
up a 2:00AM with a headache, went to get the tylenol and went into the room
with the test rig on the bench.  I turned on the frequency counter and found
that the circuit was running in free oscillation with no input.
Although no power was being produced the free running oscillations were
filling my living space with a high freq ultrasonic squeal that as Joel has
warned will give you a migrane headache in short order.  The free oscillation
was  [D [Ds around 44KHZ with the freq counter ranging up and down (no lock
on). I had to take the circuit apart to stop the ultrasonic ringing.  As Joel
has pointed out these titanium zirconate transducers, once set into resonance
will continue to ring for a long period.  Since there is possible some
conditioning taking place within the crystaline structure of the material I
believe that over a long conditioning period (burn in time) the whole circuit
can be make sensitive to a combination of two frequencies that are necessary.
The first freq involved is the input to drive the transducer which has to be 3
octaves down from the fundamental natural frequency of the ferro-magnetic
resonant frequency.  Although it has not been mentioned before in "A" public
on this net, Joel and I were successful in isolating and identifying the
fundamental Ferromagnetic Resonant Frequency as being around 174.9 KHZ.
Dosen't it sound ironic that this freq should fall so close to what the Corums
have determined that Tesla designed his big coil out in Colorado springs
around? I hav eread several art icles that speculated that the ferromagnetic
freq or the earth natural magnetic field resonated around 180KHZ.  With this
174.9 freq in mind we have applied the Joel McClain "Rule of Nines" to the
circuit where we run the transducer at a freq that is a multiple of the
fundamental 174.9 ferroresonant freq.  His circuit is running at a fifth and
mine is running at a third.
Example- I input a sine wave signal at 2.28 V AC into the series resonant
circuit at 59070HZ and get a voltage developed across the transducer of 26.04V
and a voltage across the coil of 24.02 with an output voltage from the bridge
rectifier of 30.2 V DC.  If every thing is running in an ideal phase
relationship (transducer oscillations and ferro-coil oscillations) then the
beat freq will partially sum the two voltages since they are in a series
circuit and set up a circulating current in the primary which when the primary
winding and the secondary windings have the proper impedance matching will
extract the maximum amout of energy from the circulating current in the
transformer into a healthy output at the bridge which is far OVER-UNITY, high
I/O ratio.  My circuit is showing a 13:1 ratio at this time and I have not
even approached a good impedance match in the windings.  A real sharp RF
engineer could sort all the details out in short order.  I don't profess to be
an RF engineer but have a good background in electronics.  This is the reason
for Joel and I going "PUBLIC DOMAIN" with tyhe circuit so that some highly
skilled folks out there can take this circuit and help develope it into
something of practical use.  We don't want PROFIT motivated people to "rip"
off the idea for self gain. We want any potential benefits of the circuit to
remain free for the taking.  More notes as we learn more.  As Joel says, "we
are like teanagers learning to drive dads olds".  A little help from
interested fellow researchers is welcome.

Norm

===============================================================================

DATE/TIME: 12/14/94 09:19
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : ALL
Subject: MRA (Tech Bulletin)
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

In our discussion of the MRA circuit we keep referring to the key part of the
circuit as being a transducer.  Let me clarify this a litle for I know there
are a lot of folks out there who will be running around looking for that same
device that we have.  First let's settle the confusion about the type of
material involved.
Jerry Decker and I bought some of these devices from Tanner Electronics here
in Dallas and were told that they were BARIUM TITANATE transducers made for
the ultra-sonic heads in the ultra-sonic welders used in the plastics
industry.
There are numerous manufacturers of such welding devices in which
they stack these devices (each rated at 50 Watts) to get the total power
needed to weld plastic by kinetic contact heating.
A physical description is:  2 inch outside diameter round eith a 5/8 th inch
hole through the center with a thickness of 3/16 th inch with silver layered
on each side which is convenient for soldering leads to the transducer.  When
employing these units they have to be suspended to that they are free to
resonate.  Don't lay them on a table or surface for this will dampen the free
oscillations.  We have not consulted an acoustical engineer to determine the
best way to mount the units or attach the I/O leads so as to provide the
optimum free resonances.  We have discussed the employment of tuned pipes of
the proper wave length ratios needed to enhance the free resonant or targeted
resonance that we desire. I have even thought of a mechanical type of tuning
fork device that would give us the Tesla described "CHILD ON THE SWING" type
drive that would give the maximum output with the least possible input
(wattage I/O).  A good microwave engineer would possibly come up with a tuned
cavity resonator which would drive the transducer at the optimum phase to
extract the energy needed to drive the ferro-rersonan t coil in the primary.
The magnet that Joel is useing is from an IBM hard drive and is as follows:
 [A [D [B 7 inches long X 2 inches  X 2 inches with the magnetic "Bloch wall"
across the thickness.
For those out there who may never heard the term "Block wall" it means the
neutral plane in a magnet.  The magnetic orientation is across the thickness
of the magnetic therefore cannot be described as a bar magnet which has it's
magnetic orientation along the long axis.  By useing a magnet which has the
flux across the thickness and the windings are wound around the center of the
long axis we have a coil which is wound with half of the winding turn in a "N"
field and the other half of the turn in a "S" field.

Makes no difference since the objective here is to ring the magnet into a
resonant freq and it seems to me that it is easier to ring (mechanically) with
the ends of the long axis protruding from the coil. In other words the "Node
point" is under the coil with the free ends oscillating.  There are several
ways to suspend a bar that is in free resonance.
All you have to do is open your door chime and look at how the chime bar is
mounted to extract the maximum acoustical energy from the hammer strike.  The
same objective applies here so there is a lot of work to be done to maximize
this device.
It is public so YOU can help sort it all out.
Joel is useing 150 turns in the primary and secondary of his ferro-magnetic
transformer.  Experimentation will provide the ideal ratios and impedance
matching.  Get with the program and provide free exchange of findings so all
may benefit.

Norm
Message 9930                                   DATE/TIME: 12/16/94 18:04
From   : JOEL MCCLAIN                       -- RECEIVED --
To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
Subject: Starting Over
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Hi Norm,

I'm breaking in another piezo.  It's been on the sig gen for a few
hours.  I have 1.33VAC at 34.2KHz from the sig gen, measuring current
in line.  Current starts at 4ma, then slowly drops for about three
minutes until it gets down to just 1ma.  Since the 1.33VAC is  RMS,
input power to the MRA is 1.33mw.  Output is 3.1VDC across 4.7K from
the decade box which calculates at 2.0mw.  Since the meter is rated at
200KHz, I know that we are well within its range.  Gain at this low
level of signal is 150%.  We will learn how to condition a piezo from
this, which we can pass along as another tech note.  It looks like we
have to start at the leakage threshhold and work up in terms of power
applied.  It will take a LOT of tests to keep from conditioning parts
until they are just barely marginal under useful load.  Oh well,
nobody ever said it would be easy.  The noise from the magnet is
amazing, even at low power.

Joel
===============================================================================

Message 9949                                   DATE/TIME: 12/17/94 09:39
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN                      -- RECEIVED --
To     : JOEL MCCLAIN
Subject: MRA
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Joel:  I have had my version of the MRA running for about 14 hours to
condition the magnet and the driver piezos so when I visit you we can
do some parallel testing on the two circuits for more verification of
over-unity operation. After running all night the circuit is definitely
in the (+) colume so we need to nail down the degree. I will bring out
my scope Techtronic 80 MHZ with a current probe so maybe we can further
bracket that elusive input figure.  Everyone agrees that when you are
dealing with AC at 40KHZ with harmonic bucking taking place it is
sometimes very difficult to pin down the real input wattage.  The
"equivalent resistance" test that you are doing is I guess the only
way, except for some sophisticated equipment that Hal and John have
down at the "Institute for Advanced Studies" in Austin.  More later
Norm
===============================================================================

Message 9951                                   DATE/TIME: 12/17/94 10:50
From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
To     : ALL
Subject: MRA in Conventional Theory
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

The MRA is a series resonant LC circuit in which power gain is
attainable as a result of the increase in effective impedance under
certain operating conditions.  When the series impedance increases,
primary current is reduced.  When the power available from the sec-
ondary coil either remains the same or increases as the primary
circuit impedance increases, a power gain occurs.

This is not possible with a series resonant circuit made of con-
ventional materials.  Even unity power transfer is considered to be
unattainable as a result of accumulated losses in the components,
which are passive (reactive) devices.  Materials and construction
methods are chosen for these components based upon the type of
application and frequency to be applied, with the goal of minimizing
losses.

A typical capacitor with polyethylene dielectric has a dielectric
constant of 2.3 times air.  Air has a constant of 1.0, and is the
basis for comparison.  Titanium dioxide, however, has a dielectric
constant maximum of 170, and a corresponding power factor of only
0.0006, comparable with polyethylene, so that the dissipation of
primary current in the dielectric is extremely low.  This is where
the comparison ends, because the titanium composite "capacitor" is
also a piezoelectric device as well as an excellent capacitor.

Heat adversely affects the power factor of most dielectric materials.
Titanium zirconate, however, contains polar molecules which rotate as
thermal pressure is applied.  This rotation increases the dielectric
constant if the frequency applied is equal to or lower than the res-
onant frequency of the dielectric.  At series resonance, the rotation
of polar molecules contributes to heat; as the dielectric constant
increases, a corresponding release of free electrons occurs, as a
direct result of the piezoelectric properties of the device.

In application, the MRA is tuned at resonance for maximum power tran-
sfer, then detuned slightly for maximum power gain.  This relates
directly to the use of thermal pressure at resonance, and the effect
that this has on continued polar rotation and the release of donor
electrons.

The coil, or primary of the MRA is a magnetic core which relative to
the fixed capacitance of the piezo, is a tuned permeability device.
This is often used in RF devices to attain a stable resonant fre-
quency.  Magnetic materials are chosen based upon the operating
characteristics of the intended application to reduce eddy currents
in the operating range.  In these applications, the resonant freq-
uency of the magnet itself is avoided, as this would "beat" with the
oscillating current.  However, in the MRA, this is the exact effect
which we want.

The barium ferrite magnet resonates audibly at frequencies which are
harmonics of the series resonant frequency.  The effect of this in a
typical audio application is called harmonic distortion, and is not
desirable, but once again, in the MRA, this is what we want to occur.
There is energy in the harmonics, and this energy serves to both
counter eddy losses as well as to oppose primary current flow, while
contributing to circulating current within the resonant circuit.

The net effect of this, is that when the MRA is detuned, harmonics of
the audible frequency "beat" with primary current, opposing its flow,
while the increase in circulating current couples more power to the
secondary, and therefore to the load.  This is how the power gain is
attained, basically by considering the naturally occuring harmonics
as beneficial instead of as undesirable effects to be filtered out.

When the MRA is detuned, the effective impedance increases as seen by
the source, while the power available to the load decreases in less
proportion.  This is measurable by using resistive equivalent circuit
testing.  However, the detuning is load dependent, and slight adjust-
ments are required if the load requirement is greater than the power
band of a harmonic interaction.  After retuning, the power to the
will increase in quantum intervals as the circulating current is
reinforced by the reaction of the permeable magnet core.  This will
be seen as slight incremental voltage increases across the load
device.

Once the magnet is "ringing", it's frequency and therefore harmonics
remain stable, as long as the series resonant range is not exceeded.
Therefore, the detuning affects the piezo only, and the circulating
current increase is a result of the phase relationship between the
harmonic and the source.  Voltage amplification is seen across the
primary, measurable higher than the source voltage, and this is
"seen" by the secondary.  This is not the same thing as a power gain,
because the power gain is a direct result of effective impedance.

It should also be noted that the term "virtual rotation" has been
applied in describing the operation of the MRA.  The comparison is
made with a generator, in which relative motion occurs between a
coil and magnet.  Rather than use physical energy to rotate a mass,
the MRA uses resonance to rotate the energy.  This is seen in the
polar rotation of the piezo dielectric as well as in the molecular
energy occuring in the reactive component of the magnet, ie, the
ringing.  The lattice structures of the piezo and magnet are com-
patible for virtual rotation, and the materials complement each other
electrically.

In the past, researchers have noted many effects which occur at
aggregate resonance, which typically includes a range of three
octaves.  Anomalous energy gains were referred to as "aetheric".
The aether was believed to exist outside of the three physical dimen-
sions, and could be "tapped" for free energy at resonance.  Aetheric
energy is said to be limitless, but to vary locally with increases
in earth magnetic fields at sunset and sunrise, like the tides of an
infinite ocean.  This effect is not thoroughly understood, but has
been observed in the MRA, as increases in output in the early morning,
and decreases in the early evening. This is still being studied.

Experimentation will determine the optimum MRA design for a specific
range of applications.
===============================================================================

Message 9964                                   DATE/TIME: 12/17/94 14:31
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : BILL BEATY
Subject: MRA
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Bill:  Yes Joel and I both have Techtronic scopes and Fluke 87 true RMS
meters to cross check all measurements and so far we cannot find the
"flaw" in the test procedure if there is one.  The only real test is
"independent verification" which will be done by Hal Puthoff and John
down in Austin.  If you saw Jerry's message to me, I will be sending
Walter Rosenthal a complete running circuit for a second verification
along with a complete set of all the message traffic and "Tech
Bulletins" to date.  Joel and I have done all we can do as to
verification due to not having some very advanced equipment.  The next
step is on the work bench in the form of a voltage regulator stage, an
oscillator stage and a MOSFET driver stage to drive the front end of
the circuit so we can run it "stand alone".   Norm
===============================================================================


Message 9966                                   DATE/TIME: 12/17/94 15:45
From   : BILL BEATY
To     : ALL
Subject: mra piezo source?
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

The H&R catalog has LEAD ZIRCONATE TITANATE piezos, 1.5" by
1/10", 50khz.  Think it'll work?
===============================================================================

Message 9967                                   DATE/TIME: 12/17/94 18:17
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : BILL BEATY
Subject: MRA
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Bill:  Yes those transducers will work but they are physically smaller
than the ones we are useing.  I figure when this circuit is verified
that the next step will be to go to a natural quartz milled waffer of
the natural freq we desire to same as the crystals used in transmitters
except a lot larger.  If you have access to a Thomas Directory at work,
please look up Branson who makes the ultrasonic welders so we can get a
source manufacturer from them.  Maybe someone on the Internet will know
the manufacturers of these transducers.  This circuit is a mind bender
when you study it's characteristics.  For example I started off this
morning (after I let the circuit run all night to condition the magnet
and piezo crystal) with a total over-unity power gain of 1.65:1 ratio.
After playing with the circuit all day taking measurements after each
adjustment or change of operating parameters, arrived at a 150:1 I/O
ratio.  Here are the figures:  Input 15.34 VAC @ 54.9 KHZ with .57 Ma
which is .000874 Watts which has to be adjusted for power factor by
multiplying by .707.  The output is: 16.75 VDC @ 78.8 Ma into a pure
resistive load. This figures out to be greater than a 150:1 I/O ratio.
I guess you have figured out how excited everyone is over this
"Gadget". Now unless OHMS law has been nulified or there is some
"spook" phenomenon that Joel and I cannot find then we have the 1 watt
challenge in the bag by a wide margin.  More as we learn more.  Norm
===============================================================================

Message 9981                                   DATE/TIME: 12/18/94 06:41
From   : BOB PADDOCK                        -- RECEIVED --
To     : BOB PADDOCK
Subject: (R) Magnetic Resonance Amplifier
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

 | BP>      Also see Radio Craft for March 1994 for more on
 | BP> Ehrenhaft.
 |
 |      Fumble fingers again.  :-( That should be 1944!.
===============================================================================

Message 9982                                   DATE/TIME: 12/18/94 10:13
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : ALL
Subject: MRA (Tech Bulletin)
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

I know that there are quit a few folks out there running around digging
up parts to build a MRA device to do independent testing.  Let me share
with you some findings that will assist all in this approach.  First
disregard the measurements that I gave Bill Beaty yesterday in a
message about power gain.  I like Joel find myself back at "square
one". It happens like this, when you have this circuit up on the
"ragged edge" where the first harmonic seems to be phase "beating" or
attenuating the input current and providing potential only to drive the
first stage resonance in the transducer, you disconnect the load to do
the only accurate total power consumption test which is "equivalent
resistance" measurements so we can nail down the elusive power figure
according to OHMS LAW.  Well when you unload the circuit under the
optimum operating conditions the transducers will immediately trip into
a very powerful mechanical oscillations around 2KHZ and self distruct
in short order and at the same time put out a violent voltage that can
soar above 1000 VAC which inturn will literaly wipe out your driving
amplifier and your frequency counter.  Fortunately the scope is better
protected on the front end.  So what I am saying is that you begin all
over conditioning a new set of driver transducers which even fresh out
of the box will display over-unity output in the circuit.  The people
over at the manufacturing firm that makes these transducers are
"smilling" and calling their stock broker to exercise some stock
options in their product for I see a lot of you destroying a bunch of
transducers in the process of testing and improving the circuit. Let me
share with you some ideas.  When I go back and read TOM BEARDENS works
about potentializing a circuit without the attendant circuit that is
normally involved we will have achieved the over-unity that we are
seeking.  After careful study of the MRA I can see how this device can
be separated into two separate devices.  First the piezo is a source of
high freq potential which at 3 octaves above drive the ferro-resonant
primary coil at the natural resonant freq of the magnetic material. [C
Now I believe I have figured out the secret behind the Swiss M-L
Converter known as the TESTAVISTATIKA or TESTATIKA for short.  This
device was developed in the group called METHERNETA by Paul Baumann and
it has been seen by our friend Stephan Marinov.  This ZPE tapping can
be accomplished through potential being derived from any source such as
the electrostatic charge developed in the whinshurst type generator.
The secret is in the MAGNETIC RESONANCE AMPLIFIER. Ken Shoulders and
R.A. Ford demonstrated that what we term as harmless energy
(electrostatic charge) when stored in a large capacitor is real charge
seperation and can do some interesting things such as exploding water,
wire and other interesting research projects.  If we take advantage of
the mechanical oscillations of the transducer and operate it at a level
of mechanical resonance (in free oscillation) that will optimize the
voltage output (lets say 400 volts) which inturn we use to drive the
ferro-resonant barium ferrite core coil then we can extract some
serious power from the coil providing that we have done our homework
and provided the optimum impedance matching  and tuning of the circuit
to maximize the final product.  We are a long ways from our final goal
of having a unit that we can flip a switch and the thing will run
"stand alone".  Joel and I have taken the first step by sharing with
you our findings so let's work this thing out together as a "joint
project".  We will share all findings in these Tech Bulletins so
everyone is on the same sheet of music.   Now for some "spook" type
anomalies that  occur around this circuit when it is running in the ZPE
tapping mode which is where we purposely de-tune the circuit upward in
freq so that we get the "beating" effect from the first harmonic.  When
you see this on the scope it will appear as the sine wave patern of the
input being broken into little line segments by an invisible or
transparent oscillation at a much higher freq than the primary driving
signal which in the case of my circuit is around 56.8 KHZ. Even when I
have CH 2 turned on with no signal (base line only) it also is broken
into short line segments as if the electron beam is driven into cut off
by this invisible signal.  Any RF engineers out there seen this?
Please explain same.  I believe that all the phenomenon that is being
observed by people such as Sweet, Aspden, Adams, Lambertson, Searle and
Tom Bearden are all connected by a common thread.  Let's "unravel it"
Norm
===============================================================================

Message 9983                                   DATE/TIME: 12/18/94 11:03
From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
To     : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
Subject: Piezos are fragile
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Hi Jerry,
The piezos, for all of their 50 watt capability, are fragile,
especially along the edges.  I had mine soldered at the edges, and when
it bumped into the magnet while in transport, it cracked.  The piezo
has to be free to vibrate...if you touch it while the MRA is running,
you can watch your output drop off, so it's a question of finding a way
to mount them "loose", yet protected.  However, whoever accidently
picked up my stapled pack of tech notes might let me know so I can pick
them up...has all of the test fata and correspondence with Hal, and was
on the corner of the table.
THANKS!!
Joel
===============================================================================

Message 9984                                   DATE/TIME: 12/18/94 11:13
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
Subject: MRA
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Hey!! Jerry, Don Smith is right all the way.  Let me explain- he has
basically the same circuit that we (Joel and I). In his circuit he is
useing a Tesla coil as the driver and trying to extract power in his
secondary from the "febile" background earth magnetic field.  If Don
had been privy to what Joel and I know (now everyone) then he could
have incorporated into his circuit a powerful barium ferrite magnet
which he could drive at its resonant freq and effectively do the same
thing we are doing.  In fact the Tesla coil instead of the transducer
is a much better driving potential.  It is inheriently much more stable
with much higher potentials being able to be achieved and the fact
remains that the ZPE tapping occurs in the domains of the magnet in
"Virtual Rotation".  Thoughts Jerry and Joel?????????????  Norm
===============================================================================

Message 9985                                   DATE/TIME: 12/18/94 11:55
From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
Subject: Tiger by the tail
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Hi Norm,

Sorry to hear that you also blew up your input amplifier.  We've got
a very powerful tiger by a very short tail with the MRA.  It's
purpose is to give power gain by bucking input current while using
circulating current to drive the load, and this is done in a tuned,
balanced state.  As we've seen, unbalancing the MRA by removing the
load can cause the "bucking" current to run open and blow up 40 to
50 watt amplifiers...with no other power applied.  Even the flux
from it blew up my panel mount DVM.

Well, the good news is that we are over unity...the bad news is that
we will have to cage the beast somehow.

Joel
===============================================================================

For more info:

http://www.eskimo.com/~billb


## CrossPoint v3.02 ##