🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <38jkof$8rm@paperboy.gsfc.nasa.gov> Dan_Schwarcz@ccmail.gsfc.nasa.gov (Dan Schwarcz) writes:

>If anyone ever were to actually evade the second law and produce a perpetual
>motion machine that *wasn't* a scam like the tens of thousands of others that
>have been designed in the past hundred years, that person would be so rich
>so quickly that you and I would never hear their name until they'd be *far*
>too rich to care about rounding up small-time investors.  Yet for some reason
>these guys always want individuals and families to give in a few hundred bucks 
>each!  Wonder why that is?

Yeah and Cold Fusion was a complete and utter mess right?  The concept itself 
of "cold fusion" wasn't true, but the explaination for the unexpected surges 
of DID have a real explaination.

This same phenomenon occurs in the study of hydrogen fuel cells.  Until you 
see the final result of this "Patent" you don't really have any justification 
to ramble about how wrong something is.  The source of energy of this device 
may "apparently" be in violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics, (please 
note the quotes around apparently) doesn't mean that it does.  It may be an 
unexplainable source that derives itself from an unknown and unexplored 
phenomenon of physics. (may not be but hey...)

Until I see it, and I investigate it, (a la MK2 ruminations of 
thisisbogusality) I can't say it isn't right, nor can I say it is.  Gee, makes 
me think I'm that danged cat in the box with the hammer and prussic acid.

Therefore, until somebody receives information on the process/device, it 
is(n't) does(n't) could(n't) etc.
---
===========================================================================
Adrian Kwong              akwong@bme.synapse.net               613-726-6762
Bald Mountain Ent.        ak605@freenet.carleton.ca         Ottawa, Ontario
                    <insert your infamous quote here!>
===========================================================================