Article View: sci.engr.control
Article #158Re: factory noise elimination?!
From: Daniel Ouellet
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 17:42
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 17:42
49 lines
3530 bytes
3530 bytes
In article <22NOV92211553@fnalp.fnal.gov>, boswell@fnalp.fnal.gov (Chris Boswell JHU CDF (708)840-3638) writes: |> meyers@lorenz.ocean.fsu.edu (Steve Meyers) writes... |> >announced an ability to reduce or eliminate noise associated with |> >industrial production with a technique that "uses electricity". |> >I guess their claim is they can make a factory quiet. Has anyone |> >heard about this? Is it true? |> Yes, this is true. Sound waves are waves, and |> can be interfered with, both constructively and destructively. |> If I have a speaker system such that sound waves are exactly |> out of phase with the factory motor, the sound waves are cancelled. |> You can either do this right in front of your ear, or on a surface |> around the noisy motor. To do it well with today's audio technology, |> the motor has to have a very periodic sound signature, |> which most motors do. |> I am afraid I cannot find the articles I have about it, |> but search the periodical guide in a library for |> active noise elimination or electronic mufflers. While active noise control is feasible in theory, it is in practice very difficult to implement in situations where the sound field is complex. In most industrial environments, it is difficult to characterize the sound field precisely because sources have a complex radiation pattern and you have to deal with reflexions and diffusion due to obstacles, etc, etc,etc. The idea to cancel the noise "right in front of your ear" is also nice in theory but pretty hard to realize in practice. The sensitivity of the ear varies depending on the direction from which the noise is coming. Its frequency response is not uniform and varies between individuals. The ear has a "protection mechanism" known as the acoustic reflex, which changes its acoustic impedance under prolonged noise exposure. Also consider that if you want to cancel out a wave that will hit the ear, you have to detect and characterize this wave before it reaches the ear, whatever the direction it is coming from. I could go on and on, but I think this is enough to make my point. The problem is a very complex one, and this thing is frequently brought up as a sensational technique, but we are far from being able to apply it on a large scale basis to industrial noise problems. I have heard of a few applications in simple cases (not factories) but I cannot say if these were only rumors. I have not yet seen a paper in a well recognized acoustics journal describing a commercial application. I would suggest you post to alt.sci.physics.acoustics if you want to get more feedback on this. There was a thread on this subject some time ago. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Ouellet, Research Associate Pulp and Paper Centre, University of British Columbia 2385 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 Tel:(604)822-8240 Fax:(604)822-8563 Email: daniel@ppc.ubc.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1er55oINNi1o@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!redwood.ppc.ubc.ca!danielReferences:
<1992Nov19.160238.11823@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> <22NOV92211553@fnalp.fnal.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!redwood.ppc.ubc.ca!daniel From: daniel@redwood.ppc.ubc.ca (Daniel Ouellet) Newsgroups: sci.engr.control,sci.engr.mech,sci.physics,sci.engr.civil Subject: Re: factory noise elimination?! Date: 23 Nov 1992 17:42:16 GMT Organization: University of B.C. Pulp & Paper Centre Lines: 49 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1er55oINNi1o@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> References: <1992Nov19.160238.11823@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> <22NOV92211553@fnalp.fnal.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: redwood.ppc.ubc.ca