🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.engr.safety
Article #10

Re: Wanted: Safety Engineers

#10
From: Walter Driedger
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:00
55 lines
3316 bytes
Stephen:

What do you mean by "safety engineer"?  I thought it was
someone who was primarily concerned with people and their
environment.  You seem to be describing someone who is
involved in the design of products.  I work in industrial
process control and about 1/2 of this involves safety
related interlock systems.  Would that qualify me as a
'safety engineer'?  Also, what do you mean by 'fail-safe
embedded control systems'?  I would imagine the control
system of an aircraft, a photocopier and and oil refinery
require quite different techniques and experience.

A common problem in industry is the use of the same word or
phrase for totally different applications by people with
backgrounds in different industries or even different
companies in the same industry.

Walter.

Stephen Pickett wrote:
> 
> We are looking for a few good safety engineers, but we have had
> difficulty in contacting them. WHERE ARE YOU HIDING?
> 
> We design and build fail-safe embedded control systems. We need safety
> engineers involved in the engineering/system/product design process. We
> have some safety engineers now, but have enough work to employ three
> more full-time permanent positions immediately!
> 
> We have advertised in numerous journals, magazines, and newspapers, but
> have not had much of a response. Where or how would be the best way to
> find them?
> 
> The safety engineers involved in product design, ideally, would have
> software (predominately C) and electronics design (analog or digital or
> both) backgrounds; that does not mean that they are SW/HW engineers,
> only that they are familiar with these disciplines. We follow
> Mil-Std-882, so knowledge of that would also be helpful. The safety
> engineers involved with systems would additionally need experience in
> applying 882 to systems.
> 
> Is there a different title we should use? Is there a particular water
> cooler that is more popular that we should visit? Your assistance is
> highly appreciated!
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve
> 
> "Not all views or opinions expressed are exactly the way my employer
> would probably want them stated. Nobody ever said I was PC; I only work
> with one!"
> 
> "Y2K or Y to K? I don't have the millennium bug. Somebody changed my
> calendar to read Januark, Februark, Mak and Julk!"
Technical Details
Message-ID: <36C8A12C.DAAD3DBC@cadvision.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <36C84A3E.2033811A@att.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac55,6e73d435c46e5efe
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac55,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e4d1,6e73d435c46e5efe
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e4d1,public
X-Google-Thread: fd33a,6e73d435c46e5efe
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd33a,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,6e73d435c46e5efe
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
From: Walter Driedger <driedgew@cadvision.com>
Subject: Re: Wanted: Safety Engineers
Date: 1999/02/15
Message-ID: <36C8A12C.DAAD3DBC@cadvision.com>
X-Deja-AN: 444753285
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.50.1.43
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36C84A3E.2033811A@att.net>
To: Stephen Pickett <pickett.sj@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: 15 Feb 1999 15:34:41 -0700, 207.228.66.223
Organization: CADVision Development Corporation (http://www.cadvision.com/)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.engr.safety,sci.engr.electrical.compliance,ieee.general,comp.software-eng