🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec15.171558.20524@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> wes@ian.stx.com (John S.) writes:
>I thought I was looking at sci.engr, but I must be mistaken. I just
>went through several articles about stereotypes and net advertising.
>Out of about thirty articles, there were maybe two or three that had
>anything to do with engineering. Please take it elsewhere.

Umm, you're part of the problem. You cross posted to sci.math and about
13 other groups, including sci.engr. So the answer to your question
in your subject line is a whole bunch of groups.

It is the same thing you complain about that you have done. But it
might not necessarily be your fault. With any luck, having edited the
Newsgroups line in this posting, it will only appear in sci.engr, (in
which case I'll never see it again) but that's up to my news reader
getting it right. I think the problem results when people fail to notice
things like this.


Later,
Andrew Mullhaupt